public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug other/26692] New: Build configure misses valid ld in hidden test
@ 2006-03-15 12:02 dave at datatone dot co dot uk
2006-03-15 12:27 ` [Bug other/26692] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (2 more replies)
0 siblings, 3 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: dave at datatone dot co dot uk @ 2006-03-15 12:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
The latest binutils from (linux) kernel.org is:
GNU ld version 2.16.91.0.6
The version test in gcc/configure fails (I think) because it doesn't check for
five digit groups in the version number. I hand-edited configure to add an
extra line that tests for the extra group and that seemed to work.
This issue makes the build think that the linker doesn't support 'hidden'; then
an attempt to compile glibc with the resulting compiler gives:
checking whether __attribute__((visibility())) is supported... no
and glibc can't be built.
--
Summary: Build configure misses valid ld in hidden test
Product: gcc
Version: 4.0.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: other
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: dave at datatone dot co dot uk
GCC build triplet: i586-pc-linux-gnu
GCC host triplet: i586-pc-linux-gnu
GCC target triplet: i586-pc-linux-gnu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26692
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [Bug other/26692] Build configure misses valid ld in hidden test
2006-03-15 12:02 [Bug other/26692] New: Build configure misses valid ld in hidden test dave at datatone dot co dot uk
@ 2006-03-15 12:27 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-03-15 15:50 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-03-15 16:13 ` dave at datatone dot co dot uk
2 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-03-15 12:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-15 12:27 -------
(In reply to comment #0)
> The latest binutils from (linux) kernel.org is:
> GNU ld version 2.16.91.0.6
Don't use That binutils. That is not an official FSF binutils.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26692
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [Bug other/26692] Build configure misses valid ld in hidden test
2006-03-15 12:02 [Bug other/26692] New: Build configure misses valid ld in hidden test dave at datatone dot co dot uk
2006-03-15 12:27 ` [Bug other/26692] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2006-03-15 15:50 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-03-15 16:13 ` dave at datatone dot co dot uk
2 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-03-15 15:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-15 15:50 -------
Can you attach config.log from the gcc subdirectory?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26692
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [Bug other/26692] Build configure misses valid ld in hidden test
2006-03-15 12:02 [Bug other/26692] New: Build configure misses valid ld in hidden test dave at datatone dot co dot uk
2006-03-15 12:27 ` [Bug other/26692] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-03-15 15:50 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2006-03-15 16:13 ` dave at datatone dot co dot uk
2 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: dave at datatone dot co dot uk @ 2006-03-15 16:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #3 from dave at datatone dot co dot uk 2006-03-15 16:12 -------
Subject: Re: Build configure misses valid ld in hidden test
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
> ------- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-15 15:50 -------
> Can you attach config.log from the gcc subdirectory?
>
>
>
Ah... I have taken your previous comment to heart and have replaced
binutils with binutils-2.16.1.
I am now recompiling the compiler and all is well with the hidden test.
However, I will go back
and recreate the kernel.org binutils situation ASAP.
Regards,
Dave
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26692
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [Bug other/26692] Build configure misses valid ld in hidden test
[not found] <bug-26692-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
@ 2012-01-19 4:53 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2012-01-19 4:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26692
Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution| |WONTFIX
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-01-19 04:16:29 UTC ---
Closing as won't fix as this version of binutils is not an official version of
binutils.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2012-01-19 4:17 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2006-03-15 12:02 [Bug other/26692] New: Build configure misses valid ld in hidden test dave at datatone dot co dot uk
2006-03-15 12:27 ` [Bug other/26692] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-03-15 15:50 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-03-15 16:13 ` dave at datatone dot co dot uk
[not found] <bug-26692-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2012-01-19 4:53 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).