public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug other/26692]  New: Build configure misses valid ld in hidden test
@ 2006-03-15 12:02 dave at datatone dot co dot uk
  2006-03-15 12:27 ` [Bug other/26692] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (2 more replies)
  0 siblings, 3 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: dave at datatone dot co dot uk @ 2006-03-15 12:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

The latest binutils from (linux) kernel.org is:
GNU ld version 2.16.91.0.6

The version test in gcc/configure fails (I think) because it doesn't check for
five digit groups in the version number. I hand-edited configure to add an
extra line that tests for the extra group and that seemed to work.
This issue makes the build think that the linker doesn't support 'hidden'; then
an attempt to compile glibc with the resulting compiler gives:

checking whether __attribute__((visibility())) is supported... no

and glibc can't be built.


-- 
           Summary: Build configure misses valid ld in hidden test
           Product: gcc
           Version: 4.0.2
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: other
        AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
        ReportedBy: dave at datatone dot co dot uk
 GCC build triplet: i586-pc-linux-gnu
  GCC host triplet: i586-pc-linux-gnu
GCC target triplet: i586-pc-linux-gnu


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26692


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* [Bug other/26692] Build configure misses valid ld in hidden test
  2006-03-15 12:02 [Bug other/26692] New: Build configure misses valid ld in hidden test dave at datatone dot co dot uk
@ 2006-03-15 12:27 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2006-03-15 15:50 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2006-03-15 16:13 ` dave at datatone dot co dot uk
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-03-15 12:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2006-03-15 12:27 -------
(In reply to comment #0)
> The latest binutils from (linux) kernel.org is:
> GNU ld version 2.16.91.0.6

Don't use That binutils.  That is not an official FSF binutils.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26692


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* [Bug other/26692] Build configure misses valid ld in hidden test
  2006-03-15 12:02 [Bug other/26692] New: Build configure misses valid ld in hidden test dave at datatone dot co dot uk
  2006-03-15 12:27 ` [Bug other/26692] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2006-03-15 15:50 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2006-03-15 16:13 ` dave at datatone dot co dot uk
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-03-15 15:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2006-03-15 15:50 -------
Can you attach config.log from the gcc subdirectory?


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26692


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* [Bug other/26692] Build configure misses valid ld in hidden test
  2006-03-15 12:02 [Bug other/26692] New: Build configure misses valid ld in hidden test dave at datatone dot co dot uk
  2006-03-15 12:27 ` [Bug other/26692] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2006-03-15 15:50 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2006-03-15 16:13 ` dave at datatone dot co dot uk
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: dave at datatone dot co dot uk @ 2006-03-15 16:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #3 from dave at datatone dot co dot uk  2006-03-15 16:12 -------
Subject: Re:  Build configure misses valid ld in hidden test

pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
> ------- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2006-03-15 15:50 -------
> Can you attach config.log from the gcc subdirectory?
>
>
>   
Ah... I have taken your previous comment to heart and have replaced 
binutils with binutils-2.16.1.

I am now recompiling the compiler and all is well with the hidden test. 
However, I will go back
and recreate the kernel.org binutils situation ASAP.

Regards,
Dave


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26692


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* [Bug other/26692] Build configure misses valid ld in hidden test
       [not found] <bug-26692-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
@ 2012-01-19  4:53 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2012-01-19  4:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26692

Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |WONTFIX

--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-01-19 04:16:29 UTC ---
Closing as won't fix as this version of binutils is not an official version of
binutils.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2012-01-19  4:17 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2006-03-15 12:02 [Bug other/26692] New: Build configure misses valid ld in hidden test dave at datatone dot co dot uk
2006-03-15 12:27 ` [Bug other/26692] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-03-15 15:50 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-03-15 16:13 ` dave at datatone dot co dot uk
     [not found] <bug-26692-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2012-01-19  4:53 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).