* [Bug target/26702] Size of static variables always zero on arm-elf
2006-03-15 18:30 [Bug c/26702] New: Size of static variables always zero on arm-elf sjackman at gmail dot com
@ 2006-03-15 18:38 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-03-15 18:51 ` sjackman at gmail dot com
` (8 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-03-15 18:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-15 18:38 -------
What does the output of -S show? I bet it is just putting static_foo in a BSS
using lcomm but I could be wrong. This might not be a gcc bug.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Component|c |target
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26702
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/26702] Size of static variables always zero on arm-elf
2006-03-15 18:30 [Bug c/26702] New: Size of static variables always zero on arm-elf sjackman at gmail dot com
2006-03-15 18:38 ` [Bug target/26702] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2006-03-15 18:51 ` sjackman at gmail dot com
2006-03-15 18:53 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (7 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: sjackman at gmail dot com @ 2006-03-15 18:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #2 from sjackman at gmail dot com 2006-03-15 18:51 -------
Subject: Re: Size of static variables always zero on arm-elf
On 15 Mar 2006 18:38:46 -0000, pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
<gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> wrote:
> What does the output of -S show? I bet it is just putting static_foo in a BSS
> using lcomm but I could be wrong. This might not be a gcc bug.
$ arm-elf-readelf -S foo.o
There are 8 section headers, starting at offset 0x7c:
Section Headers:
[Nr] Name Type Addr Off Size ES Flg Lk Inf
Al
[ 0] NULL 00000000 000000 000000 00 0 0
0
[ 1] .text PROGBITS 00000000 000034 000000 00 AX 0 0
1
[ 2] .data PROGBITS 00000000 000034 000000 00 WA 0 0
1
[ 3] .bss NOBITS 00000000 000034 000004 00 WA 0 0
4
[ 4] .comment PROGBITS 00000000 000034 000012 00 0 0
1
[ 5] .shstrtab STRTAB 00000000 000046 000035 00 0 0
1
[ 6] .symtab SYMTAB 00000000 0001bc 000090 10 7 8
4
[ 7] .strtab STRTAB 00000000 00024c 000019 00 0 0
1
Key to Flags:
W (write), A (alloc), X (execute), M (merge), S (strings)
I (info), L (link order), G (group), x (unknown)
O (extra OS processing required) o (OS specific), p (processor specific)
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26702
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/26702] Size of static variables always zero on arm-elf
2006-03-15 18:30 [Bug c/26702] New: Size of static variables always zero on arm-elf sjackman at gmail dot com
2006-03-15 18:38 ` [Bug target/26702] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-03-15 18:51 ` sjackman at gmail dot com
@ 2006-03-15 18:53 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-03-15 19:03 ` sjackman at gmail dot com
` (6 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-03-15 18:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-15 18:53 -------
No I mean what is the assembly output from GCC which you get by invoking gcc
with -S.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26702
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/26702] Size of static variables always zero on arm-elf
2006-03-15 18:30 [Bug c/26702] New: Size of static variables always zero on arm-elf sjackman at gmail dot com
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2006-03-15 18:53 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2006-03-15 19:03 ` sjackman at gmail dot com
2006-03-15 19:07 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (5 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: sjackman at gmail dot com @ 2006-03-15 19:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #4 from sjackman at gmail dot com 2006-03-15 19:03 -------
Subject: Re: Size of static variables always zero on arm-elf
On 15 Mar 2006 18:53:53 -0000, pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
<gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> wrote:
> No I mean what is the assembly output from GCC which you get by invoking gcc
> with -S.
It does not appear to use lcomm for static_foo. If it's not a gcc bug,
is it a gas bug or a binutils bug?
-- sdj
$ arm-elf-gcc -S foo.c
$ cat foo.s
.file "foo.c"
.bss
.align 2
static_foo:
.space 4
.comm foo,4,4
.ident "GCC: (GNU) 4.1.0"
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26702
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/26702] Size of static variables always zero on arm-elf
2006-03-15 18:30 [Bug c/26702] New: Size of static variables always zero on arm-elf sjackman at gmail dot com
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2006-03-15 19:03 ` sjackman at gmail dot com
@ 2006-03-15 19:07 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-03-15 20:01 ` sjackman at gmail dot com
` (4 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-03-15 19:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #5 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-15 19:07 -------
Can you try one more thing:
static int static_foo = 1;
And then use readelf -s on the object file?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26702
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/26702] Size of static variables always zero on arm-elf
2006-03-15 18:30 [Bug c/26702] New: Size of static variables always zero on arm-elf sjackman at gmail dot com
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2006-03-15 19:07 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2006-03-15 20:01 ` sjackman at gmail dot com
2006-03-15 20:02 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (3 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: sjackman at gmail dot com @ 2006-03-15 20:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #6 from sjackman at gmail dot com 2006-03-15 20:01 -------
Subject: Re: Size of static variables always zero on arm-elf
On 15 Mar 2006 19:07:12 -0000, pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org > Can
you try one more thing:
> static int static_foo = 1;
>
> And then use readelf -s on the object file?
$ cat foo.c
int foo;
static int static_foo = 1;
$ arm-elf-gcc -c foo.c
$ arm-elf-readelf -s foo.o | grep foo
1: 00000000 0 FILE LOCAL DEFAULT ABS foo.c
5: 00000000 4 OBJECT LOCAL DEFAULT 2 static_foo
8: 00000004 4 OBJECT GLOBAL DEFAULT COM foo
$ arm-elf-gcc -S foo.c
$ cat foo.s
.file "foo.c"
.data
.align 2
.type static_foo, %object
.size static_foo, 4
static_foo:
.word 1
.comm foo,4,4
.ident "GCC: (GNU) 4.1.0"
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26702
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/26702] Size of static variables always zero on arm-elf
2006-03-15 18:30 [Bug c/26702] New: Size of static variables always zero on arm-elf sjackman at gmail dot com
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2006-03-15 20:01 ` sjackman at gmail dot com
@ 2006-03-15 20:02 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-03-15 20:10 ` sjackman at gmail dot com
` (2 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-03-15 20:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #7 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-15 20:02 -------
Ok, this is a GCC bug for not outputing .size.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26702
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/26702] Size of static variables always zero on arm-elf
2006-03-15 18:30 [Bug c/26702] New: Size of static variables always zero on arm-elf sjackman at gmail dot com
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2006-03-15 20:02 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2006-03-15 20:10 ` sjackman at gmail dot com
2009-04-29 16:50 ` [Bug target/26702] .size is not emitted for BSS variables ramana at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-12-14 23:14 ` rearnsha at gcc dot gnu dot org
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: sjackman at gmail dot com @ 2006-03-15 20:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #8 from sjackman at gmail dot com 2006-03-15 20:10 -------
Subject: Re: Size of static variables always zero on arm-elf
GCC is not emitting the type or size information for static bss symbols.
-- sdj
$ echo 'static int foo = 1;' >foo.c
$ arm-elf-gcc -S foo.c -odata.s
$ echo 'static int foo;' >foo.c
$ arm-elf-gcc -S foo.c -obss.s
$ diff -u data.s bss.s
--- data.s 2006-03-15 13:08:17.000000000 -0700
+++ bss.s 2006-03-15 13:08:17.000000000 -0700
@@ -1,8 +1,6 @@
.file "foo.c"
- .data
+ .bss
.align 2
- .type foo, %object
- .size foo, 4
foo:
- .word 1
+ .space 4
.ident "GCC: (GNU) 4.1.0"
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26702
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/26702] .size is not emitted for BSS variables
2006-03-15 18:30 [Bug c/26702] New: Size of static variables always zero on arm-elf sjackman at gmail dot com
` (7 preceding siblings ...)
2006-03-15 20:10 ` sjackman at gmail dot com
@ 2009-04-29 16:50 ` ramana at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-12-14 23:14 ` rearnsha at gcc dot gnu dot org
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: ramana at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2009-04-29 16:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #9 from ramana at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-29 16:50 -------
This appears today with trunk and eabi at r146638.
--
ramana at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00 |2009-04-29 16:50:24
date| |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26702
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/26702] .size is not emitted for BSS variables
2006-03-15 18:30 [Bug c/26702] New: Size of static variables always zero on arm-elf sjackman at gmail dot com
` (8 preceding siblings ...)
2009-04-29 16:50 ` [Bug target/26702] .size is not emitted for BSS variables ramana at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2009-12-14 23:14 ` rearnsha at gcc dot gnu dot org
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: rearnsha at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2009-12-14 23:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #10 from rearnsha at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-12-14 23:14 -------
While getting the size right is useful, it's not something that can be relied
on by users, so this is really an enhancement.
--
rearnsha at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Severity|normal |enhancement
Priority|P3 |P4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26702
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread