From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 31632 invoked by alias); 22 Mar 2006 15:36:46 -0000 Received: (qmail 31557 invoked by alias); 22 Mar 2006 15:36:43 -0000 Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2006 15:36:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20060322153643.31556.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/21829] [4.1/4.2 Regression] missed jump threading after unroller In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "law at redhat dot com" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2006-03/txt/msg02218.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Comment #12 from law at redhat dot com 2006-03-22 15:36 ------- Subject: Re: [4.1/4.2 Regression] missed jump threading after unroller On Wed, 2006-03-22 at 16:06 +0100, Richard Guenther wrote: > ; > > see tv_id - so I guess increased CCP times are expected. Nuts. I should have made a separate tv_id. I'll fix that shortly. I probably won't be able to look at the compile-time regression for your testcase until Friday. jeff -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21829