From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 16957 invoked by alias); 22 Mar 2006 18:49:24 -0000 Received: (qmail 16931 invoked by alias); 22 Mar 2006 18:49:22 -0000 Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2006 18:49:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20060322184922.16930.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug middle-end/26807] [4.2 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/torture/pr24626-1.c -O2 (test for excess errors) In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2006-03/txt/msg02239.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Comment #2 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca 2006-03-22 18:49 ------- Subject: Re: [4.2 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/torture/pr24626-1.c -O2 (test for excess errors) > I bet this was caused by the IA64 scheduler improvements on 2006-03-16. That's probably a good candidate. Results at Wed Mar 15 00:20:13 UTC 2006 (revision 112075M) are ok: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2006-03/msg01027.html Results at Fri Mar 17 16:26:46 UTC 2006 (revision 112175M) have the bug: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2006-03/msg01211.html. Dave -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26807