public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/26944] [4.1/4.2 Regression] -ftree-ch generates worse code
Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2006 16:25:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060330162517.18968.qmail@sourceware.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-26944-1008@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>



------- Comment #1 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org  2006-03-30 16:25 -------
Note that this may be also PRE confusing SCEV in presence of loop headers. 
I.e. a sort of dup of PR26939.  Confirmed though.  A regression from 4.0.3,
which is also fine.


-- 

rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
  BugsThisDependsOn|                            |26939
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |NEW
     Ever Confirmed|0                           |1
 GCC target triplet|i686-pc-linux-gnu           |
           Keywords|                            |missed-optimization
      Known to work|                            |4.0.3
   Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00         |2006-03-30 16:25:17
               date|                            |
            Summary|-ftree-ch generates worse   |[4.1/4.2 Regression] -ftree-
                   |code                        |ch generates worse code


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26944


  reply	other threads:[~2006-03-30 16:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-03-30 16:15 [Bug tree-optimization/26944] New: " dann at godzilla dot ics dot uci dot edu
2006-03-30 16:25 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org [this message]
2006-03-30 16:43 ` [Bug tree-optimization/26944] [4.1/4.2 Regression] " dann at godzilla dot ics dot uci dot edu
2006-03-31 22:41   ` Daniel Berlin
2006-03-31 22:41 ` dberlin at dberlin dot org
2006-04-02  8:12 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-04-16 19:13 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-05-02 17:38 ` steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-05-03 18:55 ` dann at godzilla dot ics dot uci dot edu
2006-05-03 19:00   ` Andrew Pinski
2006-05-03 19:00 ` pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu
2006-05-03 21:33 ` steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-05-03 21:53 ` dann at godzilla dot ics dot uci dot edu
2006-05-04 21:25 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-05-25  2:39 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-02-14  9:10 ` [Bug tree-optimization/26944] [4.1/4.2/4.3 " mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-06-18  5:28 ` [Bug tree-optimization/26944] [4.1/4.2 " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-07-04 20:22 ` [Bug tree-optimization/26944] [4.2 " jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-03-30 15:51 ` jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20060330162517.18968.qmail@sourceware.org \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).