From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 5994 invoked by alias); 1 Apr 2006 20:48:10 -0000 Received: (qmail 5971 invoked by uid 48); 1 Apr 2006 20:48:08 -0000 Date: Sat, 01 Apr 2006 20:48:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20060401204808.5970.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug fortran/17298] gfortran ICE: Not Implemented: Scalarization of non-elemental intrinsic: __transfer1 In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2006-04/txt/msg00038.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Comment #16 from kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-01 20:48 ------- (In reply to comment #15) > > No, it isn't portable to big endian. How are you executing this > > test. > > gmake -k check-fortran. :-) > > > I added a { target i?86-*-* x86_64-*-* } to the dg-do clause. > > Not on the 4.1 branch. Whoops. I thought I had committed to both branches. > And why? Is there anything specific to x86 in the test? Because there isn't a { target-little-endian } dg directive. Additionally, I knew pault was working on a general fix for problem. I was just trying to permit big-endian system ignore the testcase Note, pault has submitted a new patch earlier today. I hope to review it shortly. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17298