[Bug target/10274] [HP-PA] ICE in output_cbranch, at config/pa/pa.c:5549

[Bug target/10274] [HP-PA] ICE in output_cbranch, at config/pa/pa.c:5549

[danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org]

------- Comment #12 from danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org  2006-04-09 17:19 -------
Subject: Bug 10274

Author: danglin
Date: Sun Apr  9 17:19:42 2006
New Revision: 112805

URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=112805
Log:
        PR target/26743
        PR target/11254
        PR target/10274
        * pa.md (cbranch patterns): Revise arguments used in calls to
        output_cbranch, output_bb and output_bvd.  Add long branch length
        attributes.
        (fbranch patterns): Handle long branches.
        (jump): Revise length check.  Revise arguments for output_lbranch call.
        Add long branch length attributes.
        (decrement_and_branch_until_zero): Add long branch length attributes.
        (output_movb, output_parallel_addb and output_parallel_movb patterns):
        Likewise.  Revise arguments for output_parallel_addb and
        output_parallel_movb calls.
        * pa-protos.h (output_cbranch, output_lbranch, output_bb, output_bvb,
        output_parallel_movb and output_parallel_addb): Update prototypes.
        * pa.c (output_cbranch): Revise arguments.  Correct handling of
        nullification in long branches.
        (output_lbranch): Add new argument to control extraction of delay
        instruction.
        (output_bb): Handle long branches.
        (output_bvb, output_dbra, output_movb, output_parallel_movb,
        output_parallel_addb): Likewise.


Modified:
    trunk/gcc/ChangeLog
    trunk/gcc/config/pa/pa-protos.h
    trunk/gcc/config/pa/pa.c
    trunk/gcc/config/pa/pa.md


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10274

[Bug target/10274] [HP-PA] ICE in output_cbranch, at config/pa/pa.c:5549

[danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org]

------- Comment #13 from danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org  2006-04-09 17:45 -------
Fixed on trunk (hopefully).


-- 

danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10274

[Bug target/10274] [HP-PA] ICE in output_cbranch, at config/pa/pa.c:5549

[pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org]

-- 

pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
   Target Milestone|---                         |4.2.0


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10274

[Bug target/10274] [HP-PA] ICE in output_cbranch, at config/pa/pa.c:5549

[dhazeghi@yahoo.com]

PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10274



------- Additional Comments From dhazeghi@yahoo.com  2003-05-25 07:40 -------
Hello,

with gcc 3.3 branch (20030514) and binutils 2.13.2.1, I can't reproduce the error you experienced. 
The testcase compiles and assembles fine. Would it be possible for you to check whether this 
problem is still occuring for you with gcc 3.3 final? Thanks,

Dara



------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

[Bug target/10274] [HP-PA] ICE in output_cbranch, at config/pa/pa.c:5549

[joel.soete@tiscali.be]

PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10274



------- Additional Comments From joel.soete@tiscali.be  2003-05-25 11:00 -------
Subject: Re: [Bug target/10274] [HP-PA] ICE in output_cbranch, at config/pa/pa.c:5549

dhazeghi@yahoo.com wrote:

>PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.
>
>http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10274
>
>
>
>------- Additional Comments From dhazeghi@yahoo.com  2003-05-25 07:40 -------
>Hello,
>
>with gcc 3.3 branch (20030514) and binutils 2.13.2.1, I can't reproduce the error you experienced. 
>The testcase compiles and assembles fine. Would it be possible for you to check whether this 
>problem is still occuring for you with gcc 3.3 final? Thanks,
>
>Dara
>
>
>
>------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
>You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
>
>  
>
Great, I will try to rebuild it asap and let you inform.

Thanks a lot for your attention,
    Joel





------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

[Bug target/10274] [HP-PA] ICE in output_cbranch, at config/pa/pa.c:5549

[pinskia@physics.uc.edu]

PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10274


pinskia@physics.uc.edu changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |WAITING





------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

[Bug target/10274] [HP-PA] ICE in output_cbranch, at config/pa/pa.c:5549

[joel.soete@tiscali.be]

PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10274


joel.soete@tiscali.be changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|WAITING                     |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED


------- Additional Comments From joel.soete@tiscali.be  2003-06-15 16:50 -------
I all,

I need to trut you because the pb I encounter now is:
 /tmp/ccJws8Pa.s: Assembler messages:
 /tmp/ccJws8Pa.s:151786: Error: Field out of range [-262144..262143] (-290552).

which seems to be so now a binutils pb?

unfortunately I do not have "binutils 2.13.2.1" available for my Debian distro
and  "binutils 2.14" debian dpkg still required some improvement to be fully
operational on hppa.

Thanks for your attention,
    Joel

[Bug target/10274] [HP-PA] ICE in output_cbranch, at config/pa/pa.c:5549

[dhazeghi@yahoo.com]

PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10274


dhazeghi@yahoo.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|RESOLVED                    |UNCONFIRMED
         Resolution|FIXED                       |


------- Additional Comments From dhazeghi@yahoo.com  2003-06-15 17:21 -------
Umm...

if you're still getting the errors, this shouldn't be closed until the disrepancy is accounted for. I'll 
try with binutils with the same patches as debian uses, and report back soon. It's possible that this 
problem simply doesn't exhibit itself with cross-compilations... Would it be possible for you to 
verify with someone on the parisc-linux mailing list whether they can also replicate this problem? 
Thanks,

Dara

[Bug target/10274] [HP-PA] ICE in output_cbranch, at config/pa/pa.c:5549

[joel.soete@tiscali.be]

PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10274



------- Additional Comments From joel.soete@tiscali.be  2003-06-15 18:55 -------
Subject: Re:  [HP-PA] ICE in output_cbranch, at config/pa/pa.c:5549

dhazeghi@yahoo.com wrote:

>PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.
>
>http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10274
>
>
>dhazeghi@yahoo.com changed:
>
>           What    |Removed                     |Added
>----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>             Status|RESOLVED                    |UNCONFIRMED
>         Resolution|FIXED                       |
>
>
>------- Additional Comments From dhazeghi@yahoo.com  2003-06-15 17:21 -------
>Umm...
>
>if you're still getting the errors, this shouldn't be closed until the disrepancy is accounted for. I'll 
>try with binutils with the same patches as debian uses, and report back soon. It's possible that this 
>problem simply doesn't exhibit itself with cross-compilations... Would it be possible for you to 
>verify with someone on the parisc-linux mailing list whether they can also replicate this problem? 
>Thanks,
>
>  
>
Hmm some time ago I discussed of this pb with ml about similar pb:
<http://lists.parisc-linux.org/pipermail/parisc-linux/2003-January/018938.html>

But I will go back with this more detailled info and give you feedback.

Thanks again,
    Joel

[Bug target/10274] [HP-PA] ICE in output_cbranch, at config/pa/pa.c:5549

[dhazeghi@yahoo.com]

PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10274


dhazeghi@yahoo.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |WAITING
  GCC build triplet|                            |hppa-unknown-linux-gnu
   GCC host triplet|                            |hppa-unknown-linux-gnu


------- Additional Comments From dhazeghi@yahoo.com  2003-06-16 16:37 -------
Actually, I realized you haven't mentioned what binutils version you're using. What version is it? 
Thanks,

Dara

[Bug target/10274] [HP-PA] ICE in output_cbranch, at config/pa/pa.c:5549

[joel.soete@tiscali.be]

PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10274



------- Additional Comments From joel.soete@tiscali.be  2003-06-17 06:31 -------
Hello Dara,

You have perfectly right I forget to mentionned the binutils release used.
The present debian package I use is named 2.13.90.0.18-1.7.
[I downgrade the last release 2.14.90.0.4-0.1 (always debian name) because of
some pb broken the build of linux-kernel].

btw, after the last rebuild failed on same "... Error: Field out of range ...",
I upgrade binutils to this last release (2.14.90.0.4-0.1) and only relaunch
faulty line and unfortunately it still failed with always same messages (which I
can now fully report to p-l ml): "... Error: Field out of range ..."

Sorry again for omission and thanks for your attention,
    Joel

[Bug target/10274] [HP-PA] ICE in output_cbranch, at config/pa/pa.c:5549

[joel dot soete at tiscali dot be]

PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10274



------- Additional Comments From joel dot soete at tiscali dot be  2003-06-19 06:10 -------
Hi Dara,

Here is the detailed Dave's comment
(<http://lists.parisc-linux.org/pipermail/parisc-linux/2003-June/020191.html>):
"> It is well a stub table pb?

No, this is a gcc pb.  Please proceed with a PR.  I can see the
problem.  There isn't support for long floating-point branches
in the machine definition :(

I would suggest that the code being generated for this
function isn't going to be very good.  Whenever at function
exceeds 240KB in size, then GCC needs to generate long branches
for function calls and some internal branches.  These sequences
are much longer and less efficient.  You can tweak the parameters
of the GCC's inlining model and probably reduce the size of
the generated code.  The parameters are settable from the
command line and are documented in the manual, etc.

Dave
-- 
J. David Anglin                                  dave.anglin@nrc-cnrc.gc.ca
National Research Council of Canada              (613) 990-0752 (FAX: 952-6602)
"

I think so that we can close this PR (original ICE pb) and open another one.
What's your opinion?

Thanks,
    Joel

[Bug target/10274] [HP-PA] ICE in output_cbranch, at config/pa/pa.c:5549

[pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu]

PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10274


pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|WAITING                     |NEW
     Ever Confirmed|                            |1
   Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00         |2003-08-07 02:34:51
               date|                            |


------- Additional Comments From pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu  2003-08-07 02:34 -------
Analysised by Dave.