public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug c/26643] New: Linux matroxfb_probe miscompiled
@ 2006-03-11 14:24 olh at suse dot de
2006-03-11 14:25 ` [Bug c/26643] " olh at suse dot de
` (19 more replies)
0 siblings, 20 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: olh at suse dot de @ 2006-03-11 14:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
This testcase does not return 0 on powerpc64-suse-linux and s390x-suse-linux
with compiled with -O1
but it does with -O0.
I tried all the new opts from -O0 to -O1, but adding them all to -O0 does not
fix it. No idea why.
flags=' -O1'
gcc -Wall -c -o /tmp/main.o /tmp/main.c $flags
gcc -Wall -c -o /tmp/matroxfb_probe.o /tmp/matroxfb_probe.c $flags
gcc -Wall -o /tmp/matroxfb_probe /tmp/main.o /tmp/matroxfb_probe.o $flags
/tmp/matroxfb_probe
--
Summary: Linux matroxfb_probe miscompiled
Product: gcc
Version: 4.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: olh at suse dot de
GCC build triplet: powerpc64-linux
GCC host triplet: powerpc64-linux
GCC target triplet: powerpc64-linux
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26643
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
* [Bug c/26643] Linux matroxfb_probe miscompiled
2006-03-11 14:24 [Bug c/26643] New: Linux matroxfb_probe miscompiled olh at suse dot de
@ 2006-03-11 14:25 ` olh at suse dot de
2006-03-11 14:25 ` olh at suse dot de
` (18 subsequent siblings)
19 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: olh at suse dot de @ 2006-03-11 14:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #1 from olh at suse dot de 2006-03-11 14:25 -------
Created an attachment (id=11021)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=11021&action=view)
/tmp/main.c
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26643
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
* [Bug c/26643] Linux matroxfb_probe miscompiled
2006-03-11 14:24 [Bug c/26643] New: Linux matroxfb_probe miscompiled olh at suse dot de
2006-03-11 14:25 ` [Bug c/26643] " olh at suse dot de
@ 2006-03-11 14:25 ` olh at suse dot de
2006-03-11 14:30 ` olh at suse dot de
` (17 subsequent siblings)
19 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: olh at suse dot de @ 2006-03-11 14:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #2 from olh at suse dot de 2006-03-11 14:25 -------
Created an attachment (id=11022)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=11022&action=view)
/tmp/matroxfb_probe.c
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26643
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
* [Bug c/26643] Linux matroxfb_probe miscompiled
2006-03-11 14:24 [Bug c/26643] New: Linux matroxfb_probe miscompiled olh at suse dot de
2006-03-11 14:25 ` [Bug c/26643] " olh at suse dot de
2006-03-11 14:25 ` olh at suse dot de
@ 2006-03-11 14:30 ` olh at suse dot de
2006-03-11 15:15 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (16 subsequent siblings)
19 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: olh at suse dot de @ 2006-03-11 14:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #3 from olh at suse dot de 2006-03-11 14:30 -------
generated asm is:
00000000100006d0 <.matroxfb_probe>:
100006d0: 7c 08 02 a6 mflr r0
100006d4: fb e1 ff f8 std r31,-8(r1)
100006d8: 7c 7f 1b 78 mr r31,r3
100006dc: 38 a0 00 08 li r5,8
100006e0: f8 01 00 10 std r0,16(r1)
100006e4: f8 21 ff 71 stdu r1,-144(r1)
100006e8: 60 00 00 00 nop
100006ec: e8 63 00 20 ld r3,32(r3)
100006f0: 80 9f 00 40 lwz r4,64(r31)
100006f4: 38 c1 00 70 addi r6,r1,112
100006f8: 4b ff ff 49 bl 10000640 <.pci_bus_read_config_byte>
100006fc: 60 00 00 00 nop
10000700: e9 22 80 58 ld r9,-32680(r2)
10000704: a0 09 00 00 lhz r0,0(r9)
10000708: 2f 80 00 00 cmpwi cr7,r0,0
1000070c: 41 9e 00 54 beq- cr7,10000760 <.matroxfb_probe+0x90>
10000710: 80 7f 00 44 lwz r3,68(r31)
10000714: 89 61 00 70 lbz r11,112(r1)
10000718: 48 00 00 18 b 10000730 <.matroxfb_probe+0x60>
1000071c: 60 00 00 00 nop
10000720: 39 29 00 28 addi r9,r9,40
10000724: a0 09 00 00 lhz r0,0(r9)
10000728: 2f 80 00 00 cmpwi cr7,r0,0
1000072c: 41 9e 00 34 beq- cr7,10000760 <.matroxfb_probe+0x90>
10000730: 80 09 00 04 lwz r0,4(r9)
10000734: 7f a0 18 00 cmpd cr7,r0,r3
10000738: 40 9e ff e8 bne+ cr7,10000720 <.matroxfb_probe+0x50>
1000073c: a0 09 00 04 lhz r0,4(r9)
10000740: 7f 80 58 40 cmplw cr7,r0,r11
10000744: 41 9c ff dc blt+ cr7,10000720 <.matroxfb_probe+0x50>
10000748: 38 21 00 90 addi r1,r1,144
1000074c: 38 60 00 00 li r3,0
10000750: e8 01 00 10 ld r0,16(r1)
10000754: eb e1 ff f8 ld r31,-8(r1)
10000758: 7c 08 03 a6 mtlr r0
1000075c: 4e 80 00 20 blr
10000760: 38 21 00 90 addi r1,r1,144
10000764: 38 60 ff ed li r3,-19
10000768: e8 01 00 10 ld r0,16(r1)
1000076c: eb e1 ff f8 ld r31,-8(r1)
10000770: 7c 08 03 a6 mtlr r0
10000774: 4e 80 00 20 blr
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26643
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
* [Bug c/26643] Linux matroxfb_probe miscompiled
2006-03-11 14:24 [Bug c/26643] New: Linux matroxfb_probe miscompiled olh at suse dot de
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2006-03-11 14:30 ` olh at suse dot de
@ 2006-03-11 15:15 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-03-11 15:21 ` olh at suse dot de
` (15 subsequent siblings)
19 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-03-11 15:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #4 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-11 15:15 -------
(In reply to comment #0)
> I tried all the new opts from -O0 to -O1, but adding them all to -O0 does not
> fix it. No idea why.
Because you did not read the documention that says that would not work. Now if
you instead used -fno-* to -O1 you might get a better idea.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26643
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
* [Bug c/26643] Linux matroxfb_probe miscompiled
2006-03-11 14:24 [Bug c/26643] New: Linux matroxfb_probe miscompiled olh at suse dot de
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2006-03-11 15:15 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2006-03-11 15:21 ` olh at suse dot de
2006-03-11 15:32 ` [Bug middle-end/26643] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (14 subsequent siblings)
19 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: olh at suse dot de @ 2006-03-11 15:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #5 from olh at suse dot de 2006-03-11 15:21 -------
flags=' -m64 -g -O1 -fno-cprop-registers -fno-defer-pop
-fno-guess-branch-probability -fno-if-conversion -fno-if-conversion2
-fno-ipa-pure-const -fno-ipa-reference -fno-loop-optimize -fno-merge-constants
-fno-omit-frame-pointer -fno-tree-ccp -fno-tree-ch -fno-tree-copy-prop
-fno-tree-copyrename -fno-tree-dce -fno-tree-dominator-opts -fno-tree-dse
-fno-tree-fre -fno-tree-lrs -fno-tree-salias -fno-tree-sink -fno-tree-sra
-fno-tree-ter -fno-unit-at-a-time -fno-var-tracking ' ; gcc -Wall -c -o
~olh/main.o ~olh/main.c $flags && gcc -Wall -c -o ~olh/matroxfb_probe.o
~olh/matroxfb_probe.c $flags && gcc -Wall -o ~olh/matroxfb_probe ~olh/main.o
~olh/matroxfb_probe.o $flags && ~olh/matroxfb_probe
pci_bus_read_config_byte called (nil) 0 8 0xfffffc24c10
p 0x10011448 -19
doesnt seem to help.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26643
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
* [Bug middle-end/26643] Linux matroxfb_probe miscompiled
2006-03-11 14:24 [Bug c/26643] New: Linux matroxfb_probe miscompiled olh at suse dot de
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2006-03-11 15:21 ` olh at suse dot de
@ 2006-03-11 15:32 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-03-11 15:35 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (13 subsequent siblings)
19 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-03-11 15:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #6 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-11 15:32 -------
This works on the mainline on powerpc-darwin and on the 4.1 branch on
x86_64-linux-gnu and the mainline on x86_64.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Component|c |middle-end
Keywords| |wrong-code
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26643
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
* [Bug middle-end/26643] Linux matroxfb_probe miscompiled
2006-03-11 14:24 [Bug c/26643] New: Linux matroxfb_probe miscompiled olh at suse dot de
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2006-03-11 15:32 ` [Bug middle-end/26643] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2006-03-11 15:35 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-03-11 15:56 ` olh at suse dot de
` (12 subsequent siblings)
19 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-03-11 15:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #7 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-11 15:35 -------
Can you try "-O1 -fno-ivopts"?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26643
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
* [Bug middle-end/26643] Linux matroxfb_probe miscompiled
2006-03-11 14:24 [Bug c/26643] New: Linux matroxfb_probe miscompiled olh at suse dot de
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2006-03-11 15:35 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2006-03-11 15:56 ` olh at suse dot de
2006-03-13 8:57 ` matz at suse dot de
` (11 subsequent siblings)
19 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: olh at suse dot de @ 2006-03-11 15:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #8 from olh at suse dot de 2006-03-11 15:56 -------
yes.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26643
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
* [Bug middle-end/26643] Linux matroxfb_probe miscompiled
2006-03-11 14:24 [Bug c/26643] New: Linux matroxfb_probe miscompiled olh at suse dot de
` (7 preceding siblings ...)
2006-03-11 15:56 ` olh at suse dot de
@ 2006-03-13 8:57 ` matz at suse dot de
2006-03-13 15:25 ` [Bug middle-end/26643] [4.0/4.1/4.2 Regression] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (10 subsequent siblings)
19 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: matz at suse dot de @ 2006-03-13 8:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #9 from matz at suse dot de 2006-03-13 08:57 -------
-fno-ivopts fixes it. The problem is how bitfield refs are dealt with it
seems. With -fno-ivopts the final_cleanup pass looks like so at the
interesting point:
D.2180 = BIT_FIELD_REF <*pdev, 32, 544> & 4294967295;
...
if ((BIT_FIELD_REF <*b, 32, 0> & 4294967295) != D.2180) goto <L3>;
else goto <L1>;
ivopts lead to this code at that point:
D.2180 = BIT_FIELD_REF <*pdev, 32, 544> & 4294967295;
...
if ((MEM[base: (long unsigned int *) b] & 4294967295) != D.2180) goto <L3>;
else goto <L1>;
Now BIT_FIELD_REF<*b,32,0> extract exactly the 32 bit at address 'b'.
But MEM[base: (long unsigned int *) b] extracts the 64 bit at that address.
The masking afterwards selects the lower 32bit from that, but ppc being
a big endian target this extracts the wrong half. Let's CC Zdenek for this.
--
matz at suse dot de changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |rakdver at gcc dot gnu dot
| |org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26643
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
* [Bug middle-end/26643] [4.0/4.1/4.2 Regression] Linux matroxfb_probe miscompiled
2006-03-11 14:24 [Bug c/26643] New: Linux matroxfb_probe miscompiled olh at suse dot de
` (8 preceding siblings ...)
2006-03-13 8:57 ` matz at suse dot de
@ 2006-03-13 15:25 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-03-13 23:04 ` rakdver at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (9 subsequent siblings)
19 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-03-13 15:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot
| |org
Summary|Linux matroxfb_probe |[4.0/4.1/4.2 Regression]
|miscompiled |Linux matroxfb_probe
| |miscompiled
Target Milestone|--- |4.0.4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26643
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
* [Bug middle-end/26643] [4.0/4.1/4.2 Regression] Linux matroxfb_probe miscompiled
2006-03-11 14:24 [Bug c/26643] New: Linux matroxfb_probe miscompiled olh at suse dot de
` (9 preceding siblings ...)
2006-03-13 15:25 ` [Bug middle-end/26643] [4.0/4.1/4.2 Regression] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2006-03-13 23:04 ` rakdver at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-03-14 1:01 ` rakdver at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (8 subsequent siblings)
19 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: rakdver at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-03-13 23:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
--
rakdver at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |rakdver at gcc dot gnu dot
|dot org |org
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00 |2006-03-13 23:04:23
date| |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26643
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
* [Bug middle-end/26643] [4.0/4.1/4.2 Regression] Linux matroxfb_probe miscompiled
2006-03-11 14:24 [Bug c/26643] New: Linux matroxfb_probe miscompiled olh at suse dot de
` (10 preceding siblings ...)
2006-03-13 23:04 ` rakdver at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2006-03-14 1:01 ` rakdver at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-03-15 13:21 ` rakdver at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (7 subsequent siblings)
19 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: rakdver at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-03-14 1:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #10 from rakdver at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-14 01:01 -------
The following patch should fix the problem. I am fairly sure a similar check
used to be somewhere in ivopts, but it probably got lost when MEM_REFs were
introduced (I am somewhat surprised ivopts do not ICE and produce something
that actually resembles a correct code in this case...)
Index: tree-ssa-loop-ivopts.c
===================================================================
*** tree-ssa-loop-ivopts.c (revision 111993)
--- tree-ssa-loop-ivopts.c (working copy)
*************** find_interesting_uses_address (struct iv
*** 1482,1489 ****
/* Ignore bitfields for now. Not really something terribly complicated
to handle. TODO. */
! if (TREE_CODE (base) == COMPONENT_REF
! && DECL_NONADDRESSABLE_P (TREE_OPERAND (base, 1)))
goto fail;
if (STRICT_ALIGNMENT
--- 1482,1490 ----
/* Ignore bitfields for now. Not really something terribly complicated
to handle. TODO. */
! if (TREE_CODE (base) == BIT_FIELD_REF
! || (TREE_CODE (base) == COMPONENT_REF
! && DECL_NONADDRESSABLE_P (TREE_OPERAND (base, 1))))
goto fail;
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26643
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
* [Bug middle-end/26643] [4.0/4.1/4.2 Regression] Linux matroxfb_probe miscompiled
2006-03-11 14:24 [Bug c/26643] New: Linux matroxfb_probe miscompiled olh at suse dot de
` (11 preceding siblings ...)
2006-03-14 1:01 ` rakdver at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2006-03-15 13:21 ` rakdver at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-03-29 1:34 ` rakdver at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (6 subsequent siblings)
19 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: rakdver at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-03-15 13:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #11 from rakdver at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-15 13:21 -------
Patch:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-03/msg00925.html
--
rakdver at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
URL| |http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-
| |patches/2006-
| |03/msg00925.html
Keywords| |patch
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26643
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
* [Bug middle-end/26643] [4.0/4.1/4.2 Regression] Linux matroxfb_probe miscompiled
2006-03-11 14:24 [Bug c/26643] New: Linux matroxfb_probe miscompiled olh at suse dot de
` (12 preceding siblings ...)
2006-03-15 13:21 ` rakdver at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2006-03-29 1:34 ` rakdver at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-04-11 23:17 ` [Bug middle-end/26643] [4.1 " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (5 subsequent siblings)
19 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: rakdver at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-03-29 1:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #12 from rakdver at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-29 01:34 -------
Subject: Bug 26643
Author: rakdver
Date: Wed Mar 29 01:34:51 2006
New Revision: 112483
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=112483
Log:
PR tree-optimization/26643
* tree-ssa-loop-ivopts.c (find_interesting_uses_address): Do not handle
bit_field_refs.
Modified:
trunk/gcc/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/tree-ssa-loop-ivopts.c
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26643
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
* [Bug middle-end/26643] [4.1 Regression] Linux matroxfb_probe miscompiled
2006-03-11 14:24 [Bug c/26643] New: Linux matroxfb_probe miscompiled olh at suse dot de
` (13 preceding siblings ...)
2006-03-29 1:34 ` rakdver at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2006-04-11 23:17 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-04-16 19:00 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (4 subsequent siblings)
19 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-04-11 23:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #13 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-11 23:17 -------
Fixed at least on the mainline but still needs to fixed on the 4.1 branch.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Summary|[4.0/4.1/4.2 Regression] |[4.1 Regression] Linux
|Linux matroxfb_probe |matroxfb_probe miscompiled
|miscompiled |
Target Milestone|4.0.4 |4.1.1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26643
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
* [Bug middle-end/26643] [4.1 Regression] Linux matroxfb_probe miscompiled
2006-03-11 14:24 [Bug c/26643] New: Linux matroxfb_probe miscompiled olh at suse dot de
` (14 preceding siblings ...)
2006-04-11 23:17 ` [Bug middle-end/26643] [4.1 " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2006-04-16 19:00 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-04-18 14:12 ` bonzini at gnu dot org
` (3 subsequent siblings)
19 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-04-16 19:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #14 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-16 19:00 -------
Would some kind person please attempt a backport to 4.1?
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26643
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
* [Bug middle-end/26643] [4.1 Regression] Linux matroxfb_probe miscompiled
2006-03-11 14:24 [Bug c/26643] New: Linux matroxfb_probe miscompiled olh at suse dot de
` (15 preceding siblings ...)
2006-04-16 19:00 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2006-04-18 14:12 ` bonzini at gnu dot org
2006-04-18 14:14 ` rguenther at suse dot de
` (2 subsequent siblings)
19 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: bonzini at gnu dot org @ 2006-04-18 14:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #15 from bonzini at gnu dot org 2006-04-18 14:12 -------
running a 4.1 bootstrap.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26643
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
* [Bug middle-end/26643] [4.1 Regression] Linux matroxfb_probe miscompiled
2006-03-11 14:24 [Bug c/26643] New: Linux matroxfb_probe miscompiled olh at suse dot de
` (16 preceding siblings ...)
2006-04-18 14:12 ` bonzini at gnu dot org
@ 2006-04-18 14:14 ` rguenther at suse dot de
2006-04-18 14:23 ` bonzini at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-04-18 14:23 ` bonzini at gnu dot org
19 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: rguenther at suse dot de @ 2006-04-18 14:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #16 from rguenther at suse dot de 2006-04-18 14:14 -------
Subject: Re: [4.1 Regression] Linux matroxfb_probe
miscompiled
> ------- Comment #15 from bonzini at gnu dot org 2006-04-18 14:12 -------
> running a 4.1 bootstrap.
It's been in our SUSE tree for some while and so survived bootstrapping
and testing on x86_64, i686, ppc, ppc64, s390, s390x and ia64.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26643
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
* [Bug middle-end/26643] [4.1 Regression] Linux matroxfb_probe miscompiled
2006-03-11 14:24 [Bug c/26643] New: Linux matroxfb_probe miscompiled olh at suse dot de
` (17 preceding siblings ...)
2006-04-18 14:14 ` rguenther at suse dot de
@ 2006-04-18 14:23 ` bonzini at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-04-18 14:23 ` bonzini at gnu dot org
19 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: bonzini at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-04-18 14:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #17 from bonzini at gnu dot org 2006-04-18 14:23 -------
Subject: Bug 26643
Author: bonzini
Date: Tue Apr 18 14:22:59 2006
New Revision: 113041
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=113041
Log:
2006-04-18 Paolo Bonzini <bonzini@gnu.org>
PR tree-optimization/26643
Backport from mainline:
2006-03-29 Zdenek Dvorak <dvorakz@suse.cz>
PR tree-optimization/26643
* tree-ssa-loop-ivopts.c (find_interesting_uses_address): Do not handle
bit_field_refs.
Modified:
branches/gcc-4_1-branch/gcc/ChangeLog
branches/gcc-4_1-branch/gcc/tree-ssa-loop-ivopts.c
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26643
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
* [Bug middle-end/26643] [4.1 Regression] Linux matroxfb_probe miscompiled
2006-03-11 14:24 [Bug c/26643] New: Linux matroxfb_probe miscompiled olh at suse dot de
` (18 preceding siblings ...)
2006-04-18 14:23 ` bonzini at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2006-04-18 14:23 ` bonzini at gnu dot org
19 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: bonzini at gnu dot org @ 2006-04-18 14:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #18 from bonzini at gnu dot org 2006-04-18 14:23 -------
patch committed to 4.1 too.
--
bonzini at gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26643
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2006-04-18 14:23 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2006-03-11 14:24 [Bug c/26643] New: Linux matroxfb_probe miscompiled olh at suse dot de
2006-03-11 14:25 ` [Bug c/26643] " olh at suse dot de
2006-03-11 14:25 ` olh at suse dot de
2006-03-11 14:30 ` olh at suse dot de
2006-03-11 15:15 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-03-11 15:21 ` olh at suse dot de
2006-03-11 15:32 ` [Bug middle-end/26643] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-03-11 15:35 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-03-11 15:56 ` olh at suse dot de
2006-03-13 8:57 ` matz at suse dot de
2006-03-13 15:25 ` [Bug middle-end/26643] [4.0/4.1/4.2 Regression] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-03-13 23:04 ` rakdver at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-03-14 1:01 ` rakdver at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-03-15 13:21 ` rakdver at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-03-29 1:34 ` rakdver at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-04-11 23:17 ` [Bug middle-end/26643] [4.1 " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-04-16 19:00 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-04-18 14:12 ` bonzini at gnu dot org
2006-04-18 14:14 ` rguenther at suse dot de
2006-04-18 14:23 ` bonzini at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-04-18 14:23 ` bonzini at gnu dot org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).