public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug fortran/27089] New: Module procedure with explicit result does not pass type to specification expression.
@ 2006-04-09 4:51 pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-04-09 4:55 ` [Bug fortran/27089] " pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (5 more replies)
0 siblings, 6 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: pault at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-04-09 4:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
This fault occurs in the compilation of tonto-2.2. A fix will be posted to the
list in a few minutes. There is still another problem with tonto that I am
still investigating. I will post that just as soon as I isolate it.
Paul
module test
public n_elements_uncommon_with_
interface n_elements_uncommon_with_
module procedure n_elements_uncommon_with
end interface
contains
pure function n_elements_uncommon_with(x) result(res)
integer(4), dimension(:), intent(in) :: x
integer(4) :: res
res = size (x, 1)
end function
pure function elements_uncommon_with(x) result(res)
integer(4), dimension(:), intent(in) :: x
integer(4), dimension(n_elements_uncommon_with_(x)) :: res
res = x
end function
end module test
use test
integer(4) :: z(4)
z = 1
print *, elements_uncommon_with (z)
print *, n_elements_uncommon_with_ (z)
end
--
Summary: Module procedure with explicit result does not pass type
to specification expression.
Product: gcc
Version: 4.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
AssignedTo: pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27089
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/27089] Module procedure with explicit result does not pass type to specification expression.
2006-04-09 4:51 [Bug fortran/27089] New: Module procedure with explicit result does not pass type to specification expression pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2006-04-09 4:55 ` pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-04-09 16:55 ` patchapp at dberlin dot org
` (4 subsequent siblings)
5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: pault at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-04-09 4:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #1 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-09 04:55 -------
Duuuh! I forgot a little something...
In file test.f90:19
integer(4), dimension(n_elements_uncommon_with_(x)) :: res
1
Error: Expression at (1) must be of INTEGER type
In file test.f90:19
Repeated four times.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27089
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/27089] Module procedure with explicit result does not pass type to specification expression.
2006-04-09 4:51 [Bug fortran/27089] New: Module procedure with explicit result does not pass type to specification expression pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-04-09 4:55 ` [Bug fortran/27089] " pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2006-04-09 16:55 ` patchapp at dberlin dot org
2006-04-10 16:41 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (3 subsequent siblings)
5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: patchapp at dberlin dot org @ 2006-04-09 16:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #2 from patchapp at dberlin dot org 2006-04-09 16:55 -------
Subject: Bug number PR27089
A patch for this bug has been added to the patch tracker.
The mailing list url for the patch is
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-04/msg00322.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27089
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/27089] Module procedure with explicit result does not pass type to specification expression.
2006-04-09 4:51 [Bug fortran/27089] New: Module procedure with explicit result does not pass type to specification expression pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-04-09 4:55 ` [Bug fortran/27089] " pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-04-09 16:55 ` patchapp at dberlin dot org
@ 2006-04-10 16:41 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-04-16 3:45 ` pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (2 subsequent siblings)
5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-04-10 16:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00 |2006-04-10 16:41:23
date| |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27089
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/27089] Module procedure with explicit result does not pass type to specification expression.
2006-04-09 4:51 [Bug fortran/27089] New: Module procedure with explicit result does not pass type to specification expression pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2006-04-10 16:41 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2006-04-16 3:45 ` pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-04-23 5:33 ` pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-04-23 5:41 ` pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: pault at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-04-16 3:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #3 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-16 03:45 -------
Subject: Bug 27089
Author: pault
Date: Sun Apr 16 03:45:24 2006
New Revision: 112981
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=112981
Log:
2006-04-16 Paul Thomas <pault@gcc.gnu.org>
PR fortran/26822
* intrinsic.c (add_functions): Mark LOGICAL as elemental.
PR fortran/26787
* expr.c (gfc_check_assign): Extend scope of error to include
assignments to a procedure in the main program or, from a
module or internal procedure that is not that represented by
the lhs symbol. Use VARIABLE rather than l-value in message.
PR fortran/27096
* trans-array.c (gfc_trans_deferred_array): If the backend_decl
is not a descriptor, dereference and then test and use the type.
PR fortran/25597
* trans-decl.c (gfc_trans_deferred_vars): Check if an array
result, is also automatic character length. If so, process
the character length.
PR fortran/18803
PR fortran/25669
PR fortran/26834
* trans_intrinsic.c (gfc_walk_intrinsic_bound): Set
data.info.dimen for bound intrinsics.
* trans_array.c (gfc_conv_ss_startstride): Pick out LBOUND and
UBOUND intrinsics and supply their shape information to the ss
and the loop.
PR fortran/27124
* trans_expr.c (gfc_trans_function_call): Add a new block, post,
in to which all the argument post blocks are put. Add this block
to se->pre after a byref call or to se->post, otherwise.
2006-04-16 Paul Thomas <pault@gcc.gnu.org>
PR fortran/26787
* gfortran.dg/proc_assign_1.f90: New test.
* gfortran.dg/procedure_lvalue.f90: Change message.
* gfortran.dg/namelist_4.f90: Add new error.
PR fortran/27096
* gfortran.dg/auto_pointer_array_result_1.f90
PR fortran/27089
* gfortran.dg/specification_type_resolution_1.f90
PR fortran/18803
PR fortran/25669
PR fortran/26834
* gfortran.dg/bounds_temporaries_1.f90: New test.
PR fortran/27124
* gfortran.dg/array_return_value_1.f90: New test.
Added:
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/array_return_value_1.f90
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/auto_char_pointer_array_result_1.f90
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/auto_pointer_array_result_1.f90
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/bounds_temporaries_1.f90
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/proc_assign_1.f90
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/specification_type_resolution_1.f90
Modified:
trunk/gcc/fortran/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/fortran/expr.c
trunk/gcc/fortran/intrinsic.c
trunk/gcc/fortran/resolve.c
trunk/gcc/fortran/trans-array.c
trunk/gcc/fortran/trans-decl.c
trunk/gcc/fortran/trans-expr.c
trunk/gcc/fortran/trans-intrinsic.c
trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/namelist_4.f90
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/procedure_lvalue.f90
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27089
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/27089] Module procedure with explicit result does not pass type to specification expression.
2006-04-09 4:51 [Bug fortran/27089] New: Module procedure with explicit result does not pass type to specification expression pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2006-04-16 3:45 ` pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2006-04-23 5:33 ` pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-04-23 5:41 ` pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: pault at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-04-23 5:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #4 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-23 05:33 -------
Subject: Bug 27089
Author: pault
Date: Sun Apr 23 05:33:16 2006
New Revision: 113191
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=113191
Log:
2006-04-23 Paul Thomas <pault@gcc.gnu.org>
PR fortran/27122
* resolve.c (resolve_function): Remove general restriction on auto
character length function interfaces.
(gfc_resolve_uops): Check restrictions on defined operator
procedures.
(resolve_types): Call the check for defined operators.
PR fortran/27113
* trans-array.c (get_array_ctor_var_strlen): Remove typo in enum.
Part of the fix in 4.2, which does not work in 4.1 because the
divergence is now too great.
PR fortran/26822
* intrinsic.c (add_functions): Mark LOGICAL as elemental.
PR fortran/26787
* expr.c (gfc_check_assign): Extend scope of error to include
assignments to a procedure in the main program or, from a
module or internal procedure that is not that represented by
the lhs symbol. Use VARIABLE rather than l-value in message.
PR fortran/25597
* trans-decl.c (gfc_trans_deferred_vars): Check if an array
result, is also automatic character length. If so, process
the character length. Note that this fixes the bug in 4.2
but not here in 4.1 because the trees have diverged too much.
Manifestly correct, so applied anyway.
PR fortran/18803
PR fortran/25669
PR fortran/26834
* trans_intrinsic.c (gfc_walk_intrinsic_bound): Set
data.info.dimen for bound intrinsics.
* trans_array.c (gfc_conv_ss_startstride): Pick out LBOUND and
UBOUND intrinsics and supply their shape information to the ss
and the loop.
PR fortran/27124
* trans_expr.c (gfc_trans_function_call): Add a new block, post,
in to which all the argument post blocks are put. Add this block
to se->pre after a byref call or to se->post, otherwise.
2006-04-23 Paul Thomas <pault@gcc.gnu.org>
PR fortran/27122
* gfortran.dg/defined_operators_1.f90: New test.
* gfortran.dg/assumed_charlen_function_1.f90: Add new error and
remove old ones associated, incorrectly, with Note 5.46.
PR fortran/26787
* gfortran.dg/proc_assign_1.f90: New test.
* gfortran.dg/procedure_lvalue.f90: Change message.
* gfortran.dg/namelist_4.f90: Add new error.
PR fortran/27089
* gfortran.dg/specification_type_resolution_1.f90
PR fortran/18803
PR fortran/25669
PR fortran/26834
* gfortran.dg/bounds_temporaries_1.f90: New test.
PR fortran/27124
* gfortran.dg/array_return_value_1.f90: New test.
Added:
branches/gcc-4_1-branch/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/array_return_value_1.f90
branches/gcc-4_1-branch/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/bounds_temporaries_1.f90
branches/gcc-4_1-branch/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/defined_operators_1.f90
branches/gcc-4_1-branch/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/proc_assign_1.f90
branches/gcc-4_1-branch/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/specification_type_resolution_1.f90
Modified:
branches/gcc-4_1-branch/gcc/fortran/ChangeLog
branches/gcc-4_1-branch/gcc/fortran/expr.c
branches/gcc-4_1-branch/gcc/fortran/intrinsic.c
branches/gcc-4_1-branch/gcc/fortran/resolve.c
branches/gcc-4_1-branch/gcc/fortran/trans-array.c
branches/gcc-4_1-branch/gcc/fortran/trans-decl.c
branches/gcc-4_1-branch/gcc/fortran/trans-expr.c
branches/gcc-4_1-branch/gcc/fortran/trans-intrinsic.c
branches/gcc-4_1-branch/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
branches/gcc-4_1-branch/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/assumed_charlen_function_1.f90
branches/gcc-4_1-branch/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/namelist_4.f90
branches/gcc-4_1-branch/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/procedure_lvalue.f90
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27089
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/27089] Module procedure with explicit result does not pass type to specification expression.
2006-04-09 4:51 [Bug fortran/27089] New: Module procedure with explicit result does not pass type to specification expression pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2006-04-23 5:33 ` pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2006-04-23 5:41 ` pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: pault at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-04-23 5:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #5 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-23 05:41 -------
Fixed on trunk but not fixable on 4.1 because of divergences between the trees.
Paul
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27089
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2006-04-23 5:41 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2006-04-09 4:51 [Bug fortran/27089] New: Module procedure with explicit result does not pass type to specification expression pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-04-09 4:55 ` [Bug fortran/27089] " pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-04-09 16:55 ` patchapp at dberlin dot org
2006-04-10 16:41 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-04-16 3:45 ` pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-04-23 5:33 ` pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-04-23 5:41 ` pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).