public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug fortran/26017] New: allocate (a(1:-1)) should yield zero-sized array
@ 2006-01-29 14:00 tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-01-29 15:13 ` [Bug fortran/26017] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (7 more replies)
0 siblings, 8 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-01-29 14:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
$ cat a3.f90
program main
integer, allocatable :: a(:)
allocate (a(1:-1))
end program main
$ gfortran a3.f90
$ ./a.out
Fortran runtime error: Attempt to allocate negative amount of memory. Possible
integer overflow
$ gfortran -v
Using built-in specs.
Target: i686-pc-linux-gnu
Configured with: ../../gcc/trunk/configure --prefix=/home/ig25
--enable-languages=c,fortran
Thread model: posix
gcc version 4.2.0 20060119 (experimental)
According to 6.3.1, this program should yield a zero-sized array.
Related to PR 25031 and PR 15335.
--
Summary: allocate (a(1:-1)) should yield zero-sized array
Product: gcc
Version: 4.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: wrong-code
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26017
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/26017] allocate (a(1:-1)) should yield zero-sized array
2006-01-29 14:00 [Bug fortran/26017] New: allocate (a(1:-1)) should yield zero-sized array tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2006-01-29 15:13 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-04-08 21:47 ` tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (6 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-01-29 15:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-29 15:13 -------
Confirmed.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
BugsThisDependsOn| |15335, 25031
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00 |2006-01-29 15:13:19
date| |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26017
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/26017] allocate (a(1:-1)) should yield zero-sized array
2006-01-29 14:00 [Bug fortran/26017] New: allocate (a(1:-1)) should yield zero-sized array tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-01-29 15:13 ` [Bug fortran/26017] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2006-04-08 21:47 ` tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-04-09 19:37 ` tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (5 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-04-08 21:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #2 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-08 21:47 -------
Checking wether size is negative won't work as
a complete fix for this.
Consider the following example:
$ cat a4.f90
program main
real, allocatable:: a(:,:)
allocate (a(1:-1,1:-1))
print *,size(a)
end program main
This (correctly) prints 0, but the allocated size is still nonzero
(which we probably don't want).
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26017
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/26017] allocate (a(1:-1)) should yield zero-sized array
2006-01-29 14:00 [Bug fortran/26017] New: allocate (a(1:-1)) should yield zero-sized array tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-01-29 15:13 ` [Bug fortran/26017] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-04-08 21:47 ` tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2006-04-09 19:37 ` tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-04-09 21:03 ` tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (4 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-04-09 19:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #3 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-09 19:37 -------
Created an attachment (id=11228)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=11228&action=view)
patch
This patch should do the trick.
--
tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot
|dot org |org
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26017
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/26017] allocate (a(1:-1)) should yield zero-sized array
2006-01-29 14:00 [Bug fortran/26017] New: allocate (a(1:-1)) should yield zero-sized array tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2006-04-09 19:37 ` tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2006-04-09 21:03 ` tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-04-14 17:40 ` patchapp at dberlin dot org
` (3 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-04-09 21:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #4 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-09 21:03 -------
Created an attachment (id=11230)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=11230&action=view)
This one actually works :-)
--
tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Attachment #11228|0 |1
is obsolete| |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26017
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/26017] allocate (a(1:-1)) should yield zero-sized array
2006-01-29 14:00 [Bug fortran/26017] New: allocate (a(1:-1)) should yield zero-sized array tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2006-04-09 21:03 ` tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2006-04-14 17:40 ` patchapp at dberlin dot org
2006-04-16 20:29 ` tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (2 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: patchapp at dberlin dot org @ 2006-04-14 17:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #5 from patchapp at dberlin dot org 2006-04-14 17:40 -------
Subject: Bug number PR 26017
A patch for this bug has been added to the patch tracker.
The mailing list url for the patch is
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-04/msg00537.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26017
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/26017] allocate (a(1:-1)) should yield zero-sized array
2006-01-29 14:00 [Bug fortran/26017] New: allocate (a(1:-1)) should yield zero-sized array tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2006-04-14 17:40 ` patchapp at dberlin dot org
@ 2006-04-16 20:29 ` tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-04-29 21:02 ` tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-04-29 21:05 ` tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-04-16 20:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #6 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-16 20:29 -------
Subject: Bug 26017
Author: tkoenig
Date: Sun Apr 16 20:29:24 2006
New Revision: 112988
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=112988
Log:
2006-04-16 Thomas Koenig <Thomas.Koenig@online.de>
PR fortran/26017
* trans-array.c(gfc_array_init_size): Introduce or_expr
which is true if the size along any dimension
is negative. Create a temporary variable with base
name size. If or_expr is true, set the temporary to 0,
to the normal size otherwise.
2006-04-16 Thomas Koenig <Thomas.Koenig@online.de>
* gfortran.dg/allocate_zerosize_1.f90: New test.
Added:
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/allocate_zerosize_1.f90
Modified:
trunk/gcc/fortran/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/fortran/trans-array.c
trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26017
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/26017] allocate (a(1:-1)) should yield zero-sized array
2006-01-29 14:00 [Bug fortran/26017] New: allocate (a(1:-1)) should yield zero-sized array tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2006-04-16 20:29 ` tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2006-04-29 21:02 ` tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-04-29 21:05 ` tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-04-29 21:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #7 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-29 21:02 -------
Subject: Bug 26017
Author: tkoenig
Date: Sat Apr 29 21:02:04 2006
New Revision: 113381
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=113381
Log:
2006-04-29 Thomas Koenig <Thomas.Koenig@online.de>
PR fortran/26017
Backport from trunk
* trans-array.c(gfc_array_init_size): Introduce or_expr
which is true if the size along any dimension
is negative. Create a temporary variable with base
name size. If or_expr is true, set the temporary to 0,
to the normal size otherwise.
2006-04-29 Thomas Koenig <Thomas.Koenig@online.de>
PR fortran/26017
* gfortran.dg/allocate_zerosize.f90: New test.
Added:
branches/gcc-4_1-branch/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/allocate_zerosize_1.f90
Modified:
branches/gcc-4_1-branch/gcc/fortran/ChangeLog
branches/gcc-4_1-branch/gcc/fortran/trans-array.c
branches/gcc-4_1-branch/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26017
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/26017] allocate (a(1:-1)) should yield zero-sized array
2006-01-29 14:00 [Bug fortran/26017] New: allocate (a(1:-1)) should yield zero-sized array tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2006-04-29 21:02 ` tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2006-04-29 21:05 ` tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-04-29 21:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #8 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-29 21:05 -------
Fixed on 4.1 and trunk.
Closing.
--
tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26017
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2006-04-29 21:05 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2006-01-29 14:00 [Bug fortran/26017] New: allocate (a(1:-1)) should yield zero-sized array tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-01-29 15:13 ` [Bug fortran/26017] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-04-08 21:47 ` tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-04-09 19:37 ` tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-04-09 21:03 ` tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-04-14 17:40 ` patchapp at dberlin dot org
2006-04-16 20:29 ` tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-04-29 21:02 ` tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-04-29 21:05 ` tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).