From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 12654 invoked by alias); 20 Apr 2006 16:21:37 -0000 Received: (qmail 12577 invoked by uid 48); 20 Apr 2006 16:21:29 -0000 Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2006 16:21:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20060420162129.12576.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/26854] Inordinate compile times on large routines In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "dberlin at gcc dot gnu dot org" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2006-04/txt/msg01676.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Comment #11 from dberlin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-20 16:21 ------- (In reply to comment #10) > PRE/FRE for mainline need some TLC on their compile-time performance as > indicated by this PR as well. They're #3 & #4 respectively behind the operator > scanning code and store-ccp and way out of line when compared with the rest of > the tree optimization passes. > I'll look into this in the next few weeks. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26854