public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug c++/12625] bitfields which have sizes that are powers of 8 missed by -Wparentheses
[not found] <bug-12625-4304@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
@ 2006-04-23 20:05 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-04-23 20:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #5 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-23 20:05 -------
Fixed by:
2006-04-23 Mark Mitchell <mark@codesourcery.com>
PR c++/26534
* cp-tree.h (is_bitfield_expr_with_lowered_type): New function.
* typeck.c (is_bitfield_expr_with_lowered_type): New function.
(decay_conversion): Convert bitfield expressions to the correct
type.
(build_modify_expr): Remove spurious conversions.
* class.c (layout_class_type): Modify the type of bitfields to
indicate a limited range.
* call.c (standard_conversion): Adjust the type of bitfield
expressions used in an rvalue context.
(build_conditional_expr): Likewise.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
Target Milestone|--- |4.2.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12625
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [Bug c/12625] New: bitfields of size 8 missed by -Wparentheses
@ 2003-10-15 18:07 nomura at netapp dot com
2004-07-20 15:15 ` [Bug c++/12625] bitfields which have sizes that are powers of " giovannibajo at libero dot it
` (2 more replies)
0 siblings, 3 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: nomura at netapp dot com @ 2003-10-15 18:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12625
Summary: bitfields of size 8 missed by -Wparentheses
Product: gcc
Version: 3.3.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: c
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: nomura at netapp dot com
CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
This testcase:
[siml4]$ cat bug.c
struct { int i:8; } s;
void foo()
{
if (s.i = 0) ;
}
is compiled as follows:
[siml4]$ tools/i686-gcc -c -Wparentheses bug.c
and we expect that -Wparentheses should warn as follows:
bug.c: In function `foo':
bug.c:5: warning: suggest parentheses around assignment used as truth value
but no warning is issued. This thwarts our use of -Wparentheses to
clean up our code. Moreover it's inconsistent in that any other
declaration of field "i" seems to result in a warning.
Bitfield of size 7 or 9 gives a warning.
short instead of int gives a warning.
Non bitfields give a warning.
Seen in 3.3.1 on Linux (see below), but also in the 3.2 compiler packaged
with Redhat Linux 8 -- so it's probably not too sensitive to version.
[siml4]$ tools/i686-gcc -v
Reading specs from
/usr/local/build/compilers/gcc-3.3.1_277537/lib/gcc-lib/i686-pc-linux-gnu/3.3.1/specs
Configured with: ../gcc-3.3.1/configure
--enable-languages=c,c++,f77,java,objc,treelang
--prefix=/usr/local/build/compilers/gcc-3.3.1_277537
Thread model: posix
gcc version 3.3.1 ($Change: 277537 $)
[siml4]$
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2006-04-23 20:05 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <bug-12625-4304@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2006-04-23 20:05 ` [Bug c++/12625] bitfields which have sizes that are powers of 8 missed by -Wparentheses pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2003-10-15 18:07 [Bug c/12625] New: bitfields of size " nomura at netapp dot com
2004-07-20 15:15 ` [Bug c++/12625] bitfields which have sizes that are powers of " giovannibajo at libero dot it
2004-07-22 3:22 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-10-13 12:35 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).