public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug rtl-optimization/11884] Bad address passed to function with > 8 arguments [not found] <bug-11884-6009@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> @ 2006-02-16 20:10 ` steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-24 22:28 ` steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread From: steven at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-02-16 20:10 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs ------- Comment #11 from steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-16 20:10 ------- There was a question almost a year and a half ago, asking whether this bug is fixed now. The question so far remains unanswered....? -- steven at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |WAITING http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11884 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [Bug rtl-optimization/11884] Bad address passed to function with > 8 arguments [not found] <bug-11884-6009@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> 2006-02-16 20:10 ` [Bug rtl-optimization/11884] Bad address passed to function with > 8 arguments steven at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-04-24 22:28 ` steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread From: steven at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-04-24 22:28 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs ------- Comment #12 from steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-24 22:28 ------- Reporter has disappeared. No-one has complained about this in recent GCCs (i.e. open branches) so closing as WONTFIX. -- steven at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution| |WONTFIX http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11884 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [Bug c/11884] New: Bad address passed to function with > 8 arguments
@ 2003-08-11 19:27 sdowning at fame dot com
2004-06-16 6:51 ` [Bug rtl-optimization/11884] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-09-15 3:36 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
0 siblings, 2 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: sdowning at fame dot com @ 2003-08-11 19:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11884
Summary: Bad address passed to function with > 8 arguments
Product: gcc
Version: 3.3.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: c
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: sdowning at fame dot com
CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
GCC build triplet: hppa64-hp-hpux11.11
GCC host triplet: hppa64-hp-hpux11.11
GCC target triplet: hppa64-hp-hpux11.11
The problem occurs on HP-UX 11i, with the 64-bit gcc build.
The symptom occurs when optimization (-O) is turned on. A wrong
address is being passed to the gets_prt function when arg9 is a
non-int type. The symptom is demonstrated by the fact that the
printf's of the addresses in many_args and gets_ptr are not the same.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread* [Bug rtl-optimization/11884] Bad address passed to function with > 8 arguments 2003-08-11 19:27 [Bug c/11884] New: " sdowning at fame dot com @ 2004-06-16 6:51 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-09-15 3:36 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-06-16 6:51 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs ------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-06-16 06:51 ------- *** Bug 16010 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mhx-perl at gmx dot net http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11884 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [Bug rtl-optimization/11884] Bad address passed to function with > 8 arguments 2003-08-11 19:27 [Bug c/11884] New: " sdowning at fame dot com 2004-06-16 6:51 ` [Bug rtl-optimization/11884] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-09-15 3:36 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-09-15 3:36 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs ------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-09-15 03:36 ------- Is this now fixed as addressof is now removed? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11884 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2006-04-24 22:28 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <bug-11884-6009@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2006-02-16 20:10 ` [Bug rtl-optimization/11884] Bad address passed to function with > 8 arguments steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-04-24 22:28 ` steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
2003-08-11 19:27 [Bug c/11884] New: " sdowning at fame dot com
2004-06-16 6:51 ` [Bug rtl-optimization/11884] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-09-15 3:36 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).