From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-184316-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 23685 invoked by alias); 29 Apr 2006 03:35:46 -0000
Received: (qmail 23670 invoked by uid 48); 29 Apr 2006 03:35:44 -0000
Date: Sat, 29 Apr 2006 03:35:00 -0000
Message-ID: <20060429033544.23669.qmail@sourceware.org>
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
References: <bug-27347-10484@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Subject: [Bug c++/27347] [4.0/4.1/4.2 Regression] static array member specialization failure
In-Reply-To: <bug-27347-10484@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2006-04/txt/msg02556.txt.bz2
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>



------- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2006-04-29 03:35 -------
The problem I think is the non specialization is getting in the way in that:
template<class T> char const type_name<T>::name[] = "";
is recording the size as 1.

Another testcase with a slightly different error:
emplate<class T> struct type_name { static int const name[]; };
template<class T> int const type_name<T>::name[] = {0};
template<> int const type_name<int>::name[] = {0, 1, 2, 3};


int f(void)
{
  return type_name<int>::name[2];
}


-- 

pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot
                   |                            |org
      Known to fail|3.4.6 4.0.3 4.1.0 4.2.0     |3.4.6 4.0.3 4.1.0 4.2.0
                   |                            |3.4.0
   Last reconfirmed|2006-04-28 13:33:30         |2006-04-29 03:35:43
               date|                            |


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27347