From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 8021 invoked by alias); 30 Apr 2006 05:09:07 -0000 Received: (qmail 8012 invoked by alias); 30 Apr 2006 05:09:04 -0000 Date: Sun, 30 Apr 2006 05:09:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20060430050904.8011.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug target/27363] ARM gcc 4.1 optimization bug In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "yfw dot debian at gmail dot com" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2006-04/txt/msg02615.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Comment #2 from yfw dot debian at gmail dot com 2006-04-30 05:09 ------- Subject: Re: ARM gcc 4.1 optimization bug Hi pinskia, I tried to make a simple test example for this bug. But If I put the code from ALSA subsystem of Linux kernel to a test.c file, the gcc will product correct assembly code. :(. So I put the Linux kernel assembly code(with -Os and withoud -O) to bug reporter. I will try the 4.1.1 later. Thanks & Regards yfw On 30 Apr 2006 05:01:19 -0000, pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote: > > > ------- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-30 05:01 ------- > We really need a self contianed example but I think this was already fixed for > 4.1.1. > > > -- > > pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: > > What |Removed |Added > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING > Component|c |target > > > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27363 > > ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- > You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter. > -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27363