public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "law at redhat dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/27364] [4.1/4.2 Regression] VRP miscompiles some unsigned math
Date: Tue, 02 May 2006 19:44:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060502194402.3761.qmail@sourceware.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-27364-682@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
------- Comment #14 from law at redhat dot com 2006-05-02 19:44 -------
Subject: Re: [4.2 Regression] Gcc 4.2
miscompiles binutils
On Sun, 2006-04-30 at 18:21 +0000, pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
>
> ------- Comment #10 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-30 18:21 -------
> Here is the reduced testcase:
> int f(unsigned number_of_digits_to_use)
> {
> if (number_of_digits_to_use >1294)
> return 0;
> return (number_of_digits_to_use * 3321928 / 1000000 + 1) /16;
> }
>
> int main(void)
> {
> if (f(11) != 2)
> __builtin_abort ();
As discussed in the PR, the problem is we don't detect overflow
from MULT_EXPR correctly. This causes us to get an incorrect
range which ultimately cascades into generating the wrong
return value.
This patch fixes the overflow detection for MULT_EXPR. Bootstrapped
and regression tested on i686-pc-linux-gnu, both on the 4.1 branch
and mainline.
------- Comment #15 from law at redhat dot com 2006-05-02 19:44 -------
Created an attachment (id=11362)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=11362&action=view)
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27364
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-05-02 19:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-04-30 7:13 [Bug other/27364] New: Gcc 4.2 miscompiles binutils hjl at lucon dot org
2006-04-30 7:14 ` [Bug other/27364] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-04-30 7:25 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-04-30 7:35 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-04-30 9:59 ` dirtyepic dot sk at gmail dot com
2006-04-30 14:25 ` hjl at lucon dot org
2006-04-30 15:33 ` hjl at lucon dot org
2006-04-30 15:57 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-04-30 17:55 ` hjl at lucon dot org
2006-04-30 18:11 ` hjl at lucon dot org
2006-04-30 18:17 ` [Bug tree-optimization/27364] [4.2 Regression] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-04-30 18:21 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-04-30 18:23 ` [Bug tree-optimization/27364] [4.1/4.2 Regression] VRP miscompiles some unsigned math pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-04-30 18:24 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-04-30 19:45 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-05-01 16:36 ` law at redhat dot com
2006-05-02 19:44 ` law at redhat dot com [this message]
2006-05-02 19:44 ` law at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-05-02 19:54 ` law at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-05-03 0:49 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060502194402.3761.qmail@sourceware.org \
--to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).