From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 29804 invoked by alias); 3 May 2006 19:28:42 -0000 Received: (qmail 29748 invoked by uid 48); 3 May 2006 19:28:35 -0000 Date: Wed, 03 May 2006 19:28:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20060503192835.29747.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/27392] [4.2 Regression] GCC error: in n_of_executions_at_least, at tree-ssa-loop-niter.c:1772 In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "P dot Schaffnit at access dot rwth-aachen dot de" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2006-05/txt/msg00305.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Comment #5 from P dot Schaffnit at access dot rwth-aachen dot de 2006-05-03 19:28 ------- Erm... sorry about that, I didn't think about it: I've indeed thrown out a lot (I do not have the original sources at hand, but they are happily compiled by quite a few compilers, including lf95, as far as I can tell, is a reference...): anyway, I thought that the mere fact that *any* code causes an ICE is bad, I hoped this could help, I'll try to reduce it a bit less aggressively tomorrow... Philippe (In reply to comment #4) > Phillipe, > > Your code appears to be wrong, or perhaps you've cut down a > larger code too agressively. You use the Fortran ALL intrinsic > on the allocatable NEW_NUMBER, but you have never actually > allocated memory for the array. > > -- > steve > -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27392