public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug fortran/25099] New: better diagnostic needed
@ 2005-11-26 18:07 jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk
2005-11-30 11:33 ` [Bug fortran/25099] Conformance of arguments to ELEMENTAL subroutines eedelman at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (6 more replies)
0 siblings, 7 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk @ 2005-11-26 18:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
using GNU Fortran 95 (GCC) 4.1.0 20051126 (prerelease) with '-g -pedantic
-std=f95', I get a bad / no diagnostic for the following invalid code:
integer :: I(2,2),J(2)
CALL S(I,J)
CONTAINS
ELEMENTAL SUBROUTINE S(I,J)
INTEGER, INTENT(IN) :: I,J
END SUBROUTINE S
END
--
Summary: better diagnostic needed
Product: gcc
Version: 4.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25099
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/25099] Conformance of arguments to ELEMENTAL subroutines
2005-11-26 18:07 [Bug fortran/25099] New: better diagnostic needed jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk
@ 2005-11-30 11:33 ` eedelman at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-11-30 13:23 ` eedelman at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (5 subsequent siblings)
6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: eedelman at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-11-30 11:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #1 from eedelman at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-30 11:33 -------
Currently gfortran crashes on this code, because of PR 22146. I'll leave this
PR (rather than marking it as a duplicate) as a reminder that, when we fix PR
22146, we need to check conformance of arguments as well.
--
eedelman at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |eedelman at gcc dot gnu dot
| |org
BugsThisDependsOn| |22146
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
Keywords| |diagnostic
Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00 |2005-11-30 11:33:00
date| |
Summary|better diagnostic needed |Conformance of arguments to
| |ELEMENTAL subroutines
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25099
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/25099] Conformance of arguments to ELEMENTAL subroutines
2005-11-26 18:07 [Bug fortran/25099] New: better diagnostic needed jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk
2005-11-30 11:33 ` [Bug fortran/25099] Conformance of arguments to ELEMENTAL subroutines eedelman at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-11-30 13:23 ` eedelman at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-03-01 2:14 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (4 subsequent siblings)
6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: eedelman at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-11-30 13:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #2 from eedelman at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-30 13:23 -------
*** Bug 25100 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25099
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/25099] Conformance of arguments to ELEMENTAL subroutines
2005-11-26 18:07 [Bug fortran/25099] New: better diagnostic needed jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk
2005-11-30 11:33 ` [Bug fortran/25099] Conformance of arguments to ELEMENTAL subroutines eedelman at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-11-30 13:23 ` eedelman at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2006-03-01 2:14 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-04-21 16:15 ` patchapp at dberlin dot org
` (3 subsequent siblings)
6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-03-01 2:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-01 02:14 -------
This ICEs for me on the mainline, backtrace:
#0 integer_onep (expr=0x0) at /Users/pinskia/src/gcc/local/gcc/gcc/tree.c:1226
#1 0x0006bf90 in gfc_conv_loop_setup (loop=0xbffff7d8) at
/Users/pinskia/src/gcc/local/gcc/gcc/fortran/trans-array.c:2738
#2 0x0008d698 in gfc_trans_call (code=0x42b01350) at
/Users/pinskia/src/gcc/local/gcc/gcc/fortran/trans-stmt.c:268
#3 0x00064fe8 in gfc_trans_code (code=0x42b01350) at
/Users/pinskia/src/gcc/local/gcc/gcc/fortran/trans.c:495
#4 0x000759c4 in gfc_generate_function_code (ns=0x42b01350) at
/Users/pinskia/src/gcc/local/gcc/gcc/fortran/trans-decl.c:2902
#5 0x00043150 in gfc_parse_file () at
/Users/pinskia/src/gcc/local/gcc/gcc/fortran/parse.c:3195
#6 0x00063e3c in gfc_be_parse_file (set_yydebug=0) at
/Users/pinskia/src/gcc/local/gcc/gcc/fortran/f95-lang.c:298
#7 0x000d9430 in toplev_main (argc=6615784, argv=0x64f3bc) at
/Users/pinskia/src/gcc/local/gcc/gcc/toplev.c:999
#8 0x00001c10 in _start (argc=6615996, argv=0x64f858, envp=0x1) at
/SourceCache/Csu/Csu-46/crt.c:267
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Keywords|diagnostic |accepts-invalid, ice-on-
| |invalid-code
Last reconfirmed|2005-11-30 11:33:00 |2006-03-01 02:14:22
date| |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25099
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/25099] Conformance of arguments to ELEMENTAL subroutines
2005-11-26 18:07 [Bug fortran/25099] New: better diagnostic needed jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2006-03-01 2:14 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2006-04-21 16:15 ` patchapp at dberlin dot org
2006-04-23 11:56 ` pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (2 subsequent siblings)
6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: patchapp at dberlin dot org @ 2006-04-21 16:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #4 from patchapp at dberlin dot org 2006-04-21 16:15 -------
Subject: Bug number PR25099
A patch for this bug has been added to the patch tracker.
The mailing list url for the patch is
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-04/msg00802.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25099
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/25099] Conformance of arguments to ELEMENTAL subroutines
2005-11-26 18:07 [Bug fortran/25099] New: better diagnostic needed jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2006-04-21 16:15 ` patchapp at dberlin dot org
@ 2006-04-23 11:56 ` pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-05-08 5:03 ` pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-05-08 6:27 ` pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: pault at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-04-23 11:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #5 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-23 11:56 -------
Subject: Bug 25099
Author: pault
Date: Sun Apr 23 11:56:37 2006
New Revision: 113194
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=113194
Log:
2006-04-23 Paul Thomas <pault@gcc.gnu.org>
PR fortran/25099
* resolve.c (resolve_call): Check conformity of elemental
subroutine actual arguments.
2006-04-23 Paul Thomas <pault@gcc.gnu.org>
PR fortran/25099
* gfortran.dg/elemental_subroutine_4.f90: New test.
* gfortran.dg/assumed_size_refs_1.f90: Add error to non-conforming
call sub (m, x).
Added:
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/elemental_subroutine_4.f90
Modified:
trunk/gcc/fortran/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/fortran/resolve.c
trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/assumed_size_refs_1.f90
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25099
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/25099] Conformance of arguments to ELEMENTAL subroutines
2005-11-26 18:07 [Bug fortran/25099] New: better diagnostic needed jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2006-04-23 11:56 ` pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2006-05-08 5:03 ` pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-05-08 6:27 ` pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: pault at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-05-08 5:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #6 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-08 05:02 -------
Subject: Bug 25099
Author: pault
Date: Mon May 8 05:01:56 2006
New Revision: 113618
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=113618
Log:
2006-05-08 Paul Thomas <pault@gcc.gnu.org>
PR fortran/24813
* trans-array.c (get_array_ctor_strlen): Remove static attribute.
* trans.h: Add prototype for get_array_ctor_strlen.
* trans-intrinsic.c (gfc_conv_intrinsic_len): Switch on EXPR_ARRAY
and call get_array_ctor_strlen.
PR fortran/27269
* module.c: Add static flag in_load_equiv.
(mio_expr_ref): Return if no symtree and in_load_equiv.
(load_equiv): If any of the equivalence members have no symtree, free
the equivalence and the associated expressions.
PR fortran/27324
* trans-common.c (gfc_trans_common): Invert the order of calls to
finish equivalences and gfc_commit_symbols.
PR fortran/25099
* resolve.c (resolve_call): Check conformity of elemental
subroutine actual arguments.
2006-05-08 Paul Thomas <pault@gcc.gnu.org>
PR fortran/24813
* gfortran.dg/char_cons_len.f90: New test.
PR fortran/27269
PR fortran/27324
* gfortran.dg/module_equivalence_2.f90: New test.
PR fortran/25099
* gfortran.dg/elemental_subroutine_4.f90: New test.
* gfortran.dg/assumed_size_refs_1.f90: Add error to non-conforming
call sub (m, x).
Added:
branches/gcc-4_1-branch/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/char_cons_len.f90
branches/gcc-4_1-branch/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/elemental_subroutine_4.f90
branches/gcc-4_1-branch/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/module_equivalence_2.f90
Modified:
branches/gcc-4_1-branch/gcc/fortran/ChangeLog
branches/gcc-4_1-branch/gcc/fortran/module.c
branches/gcc-4_1-branch/gcc/fortran/resolve.c
branches/gcc-4_1-branch/gcc/fortran/trans-array.c
branches/gcc-4_1-branch/gcc/fortran/trans-common.c
branches/gcc-4_1-branch/gcc/fortran/trans-intrinsic.c
branches/gcc-4_1-branch/gcc/fortran/trans.h
branches/gcc-4_1-branch/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
branches/gcc-4_1-branch/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/assumed_size_refs_1.f90
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25099
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/25099] Conformance of arguments to ELEMENTAL subroutines
2005-11-26 18:07 [Bug fortran/25099] New: better diagnostic needed jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2006-05-08 5:03 ` pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2006-05-08 6:27 ` pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: pault at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-05-08 6:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #7 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-08 06:27 -------
Fixed on trunk and 4.1
Paul
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25099
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2006-05-08 6:27 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2005-11-26 18:07 [Bug fortran/25099] New: better diagnostic needed jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk
2005-11-30 11:33 ` [Bug fortran/25099] Conformance of arguments to ELEMENTAL subroutines eedelman at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-11-30 13:23 ` eedelman at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-03-01 2:14 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-04-21 16:15 ` patchapp at dberlin dot org
2006-04-23 11:56 ` pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-05-08 5:03 ` pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-05-08 6:27 ` pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).