public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug fortran/25270]  New: gfortran.dg/array-1.f90 fails with a type mismatch
@ 2005-12-05 18:52 pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2005-12-05 18:53 ` [Bug fortran/25270] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (7 more replies)
  0 siblings, 8 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-12-05 18:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

Filing it here so it does not get lost (I will reduce this later).
The error message is:
/home/pinskia/src/types/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/array-1.f90: In function
'pack':^M
/home/pinskia/src/types/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/array-1.f90:23: error:
types mismatch in comparsion^M
int8D.8^M
int4D.7^M
D.1005 == 0;^M
^M


-- 
           Summary: gfortran.dg/array-1.f90 fails with a type mismatch
           Product: gcc
           Version: 4.2.0
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: fortran
        AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
        ReportedBy: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25270


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* [Bug fortran/25270] gfortran.dg/array-1.f90 fails with a type mismatch
  2005-12-05 18:52 [Bug fortran/25270] New: gfortran.dg/array-1.f90 fails with a type mismatch pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-12-05 18:53 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2005-12-05 18:53 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (6 subsequent siblings)
  7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-12-05 18:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2005-12-05 18:53 -------
gfortran.dg/array_alloc_2.f90  fails the same way.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25270


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* [Bug fortran/25270] gfortran.dg/array-1.f90 fails with a type mismatch
  2005-12-05 18:52 [Bug fortran/25270] New: gfortran.dg/array-1.f90 fails with a type mismatch pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2005-12-05 18:53 ` [Bug fortran/25270] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-12-05 18:53 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2005-12-05 18:57 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (5 subsequent siblings)
  7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-12-05 18:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2005-12-05 18:53 -------
So does gfortran.dg/array_constructor_10.f90


-- 

pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
 GCC target triplet|                            |x86_64-linux-gnu


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25270


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* [Bug fortran/25270] gfortran.dg/array-1.f90 fails with a type mismatch
  2005-12-05 18:52 [Bug fortran/25270] New: gfortran.dg/array-1.f90 fails with a type mismatch pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2005-12-05 18:53 ` [Bug fortran/25270] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2005-12-05 18:53 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-12-05 18:57 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2005-12-10  5:20 ` [Bug fortran/25270] gfortran.dg/array-1.f90 (and a lot of others) " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (4 subsequent siblings)
  7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-12-05 18:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2005-12-05 18:57 -------
And gfortran.dg/array_constructor_11.f90
gfortran.dg/array_constructor_12.f90
gfortran.dg/array_constructor_6.f90
gfortran.dg/array_constructor_7.f90
gfortran.dg/array_constructor_8.f90
gfortran.dg/array_constructor_9.f90
gfortran.dg/assign_2.f90
gfortran.dg/assign_5.f90
gfortran.dg/assign_6.f90
gfortran.dg/assign_func_dtcomp_1.f90
gfortran.dg/assumed_dummy_1.f90
gfortran.dg/char_initialiser_actual.f90
gfortran.dg/char_pack_1.f90

And too many more.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25270


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* [Bug fortran/25270] gfortran.dg/array-1.f90 (and a lot of others) fails with a type mismatch
  2005-12-05 18:52 [Bug fortran/25270] New: gfortran.dg/array-1.f90 fails with a type mismatch pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (2 preceding siblings ...)
  2005-12-05 18:57 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-12-10  5:20 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2006-04-01 19:19 ` sayle at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (3 subsequent siblings)
  7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-12-10  5:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #4 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2005-12-10 05:20 -------
assign_5.f90, assign_6.f, logint-1.f, logint-3.f, 7388.f, and a couple of
others were fixed by:
2005-12-09  Roger Sayle  <roger@eyesopen.com>

        PR fortran/22527
        * f95-lang.c (gfc_truthvalue_conversion): Use a zero of the correct
        integer type when building an inequality.

This bug report is not fully fixed yet though.


-- 

pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
            Summary|gfortran.dg/array-1.f90     |gfortran.dg/array-1.f90 (and
                   |fails with a type mismatch  |a lot of others) fails with
                   |                            |a type mismatch


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25270


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* [Bug fortran/25270] gfortran.dg/array-1.f90 (and a lot of others) fails with a type mismatch
  2005-12-05 18:52 [Bug fortran/25270] New: gfortran.dg/array-1.f90 fails with a type mismatch pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (3 preceding siblings ...)
  2005-12-10  5:20 ` [Bug fortran/25270] gfortran.dg/array-1.f90 (and a lot of others) " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2006-04-01 19:19 ` sayle at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2006-05-08  9:33 ` [Bug fortran/25270] testcases fail " fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (2 subsequent siblings)
  7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: sayle at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-04-01 19:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #5 from sayle at gcc dot gnu dot org  2006-04-01 19:19 -------
Subject: Bug 25270

Author: sayle
Date: Sat Apr  1 19:19:22 2006
New Revision: 112608

URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=112608
Log:

        PR fortran/25270
        * trans-array.c (gfc_trans_allocate_array_storage): In array index
        calculations use gfc_index_zero_node and gfc_index_one_node instead
        of integer_zero_node and integer_one_node respectively.
        (gfc_conv_array_transpose): Likewise.
        (gfc_conv_ss_startstride): Likewise.
        (gfc_trans_dummy_array_bias): Likewise.


Modified:
    trunk/gcc/fortran/ChangeLog
    trunk/gcc/fortran/trans-array.c


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25270


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* [Bug fortran/25270] testcases fail with a type mismatch
  2005-12-05 18:52 [Bug fortran/25270] New: gfortran.dg/array-1.f90 fails with a type mismatch pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (4 preceding siblings ...)
  2006-04-01 19:19 ` sayle at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2006-05-08  9:33 ` fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2006-07-05 15:09 ` fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2006-07-11  8:00 ` fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org
  7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-05-08  9:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #6 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org  2006-05-08 09:32 -------
Andrew, what is the status on that bug? Do you still observe mismatch in the
testsuite, or can we close the PR?


-- 

fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot
                   |                            |org
            Summary|gfortran.dg/array-1.f90 (and|testcases fail with a type
                   |a lot of others) fails with |mismatch
                   |a type mismatch             |


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25270


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* [Bug fortran/25270] testcases fail with a type mismatch
  2005-12-05 18:52 [Bug fortran/25270] New: gfortran.dg/array-1.f90 fails with a type mismatch pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (5 preceding siblings ...)
  2006-05-08  9:33 ` [Bug fortran/25270] testcases fail " fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2006-07-05 15:09 ` fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2006-07-11  8:00 ` fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org
  7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-07-05 15:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #7 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org  2006-07-05 15:09 -------
(In reply to comment #6)
> Andrew, what is the status on that bug? Do you still observe mismatch in the
> testsuite, or can we close the PR?

ping


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25270


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* [Bug fortran/25270] testcases fail with a type mismatch
  2005-12-05 18:52 [Bug fortran/25270] New: gfortran.dg/array-1.f90 fails with a type mismatch pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (6 preceding siblings ...)
  2006-07-05 15:09 ` fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2006-07-11  8:00 ` fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org
  7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-07-11  8:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #8 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org  2006-07-11 07:59 -------
Closing.


-- 

fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25270


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2006-07-11  8:00 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2005-12-05 18:52 [Bug fortran/25270] New: gfortran.dg/array-1.f90 fails with a type mismatch pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-12-05 18:53 ` [Bug fortran/25270] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-12-05 18:53 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-12-05 18:57 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-12-10  5:20 ` [Bug fortran/25270] gfortran.dg/array-1.f90 (and a lot of others) " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-04-01 19:19 ` sayle at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-05-08  9:33 ` [Bug fortran/25270] testcases fail " fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-07-05 15:09 ` fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-07-11  8:00 ` fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).