From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 20375 invoked by alias); 10 May 2006 20:50:08 -0000 Received: (qmail 20298 invoked by uid 48); 10 May 2006 20:49:59 -0000 Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 20:50:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20060510204959.20297.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug target/27537] XMM alignment fault when compiling for i386 with -Os In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2006-05/txt/msg01034.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-10 20:49 ------- This is confirmed, this is an interaction between stack slots and -mpreferred-stack-boundary= which is what -Os sets. This is not a regression. Maybe the real question is why are you using -Os for code with SSE in it? -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever Confirmed|0 |1 Keywords| |wrong-code Known to fail| |3.4.0 4.0.0 4.1.0 4.2.0 Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00 |2006-05-10 20:49:57 date| | Summary|XMM alignment fault when |XMM alignment fault when |compiling for i386 with -Os.|compiling for i386 with -Os |Needs ABI specification. | http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27537