From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 21913 invoked by alias); 28 May 2006 16:32:10 -0000 Received: (qmail 21853 invoked by uid 48); 28 May 2006 16:32:04 -0000 Date: Sun, 28 May 2006 16:32:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20060528163204.21852.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug fortran/27715] Extented ASCII characters lead to wrong "CASE" selection In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2006-05/txt/msg02836.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Comment #5 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-28 16:32 ------- (In reply to comment #4) > unsigned char *string; Humpf, I don't know. I don't think it's the best course of action... too invasive. > As far as the collating sequence goes... should we eventually > support locales for sorting etc.? If so, we should leave the > code in. I think we don't want locales support in sorting with the default character kind, and if we ever want to implement that, I don't think we'll want to do it that way :) -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27715