From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 11330 invoked by alias); 2 Jun 2006 16:22:57 -0000 Received: (qmail 11311 invoked by uid 48); 2 Jun 2006 16:22:48 -0000 Date: Fri, 02 Jun 2006 16:22:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20060602162248.11310.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug libmudflap/26120] mudflap behavior changes with trivial changes to build command In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "idht4n at hotmail dot com" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2006-06/txt/msg00124.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Comment #8 from idht4n at hotmail dot com 2006-06-02 16:22 ------- (In reply to comment #7) > g++f4 -o hello hello.o -lmudflap > > You need both -fmudlfap and -lmudflap when linking. > > This is not a bug. > OK - mostly my bad then. Sorry. But if you need them both, why doesn't it complain at compile time? Instead it happily gives an executable that gives bogus warnings, which IMHO is still a bug. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26120