From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 13028 invoked by alias); 5 Jun 2006 20:06:37 -0000 Received: (qmail 12871 invoked by uid 48); 5 Jun 2006 20:06:31 -0000 Date: Mon, 05 Jun 2006 20:16:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20060605200631.12870.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug libgcj/27890] [4.2 regression] lib/logging.properties pollutes common namespace In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2006-06/txt/msg00591.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Comment #4 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-05 20:06 ------- Installing in share -vs- lib is weird for libgcj. Sometimes we install things in lib to be more "jdk-like". logging.properties has been there since 4.0, at least. I don't have 3.x install trees around to check earlier releases. The security files also fall into this category. That said, I'm not against moving them about. I think Tom F. should probably weigh in, he's more involved with how the layout affects packaging and things like that. (This is important because it can have an effect on real applications.) -- tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tromey at gcc dot gnu dot | |org http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27890