From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 16501 invoked by alias); 8 Jun 2006 19:15:39 -0000 Received: (qmail 16444 invoked by alias); 8 Jun 2006 19:15:29 -0000 Date: Thu, 08 Jun 2006 19:37:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20060608191529.16443.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug bootstrap/27963] [4.2 Regression] libjava fails to build if it isn't built by default In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "ro at techfak dot uni-bielefeld dot de" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2006-06/txt/msg00966.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Comment #3 from ro at techfak dot uni-bielefeld dot de 2006-06-08 19:15 ------- Subject: Re: [4.2 Regression] libjava fails to build if it isn't built by default pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org writes: > Maybe it is better to not to disable libjava completely for IRIX. It seems But it isn't disabled completely (and I've been able to build it at some point in the past), it's just disabled by default since it requires (or at least used to require) a larger-than-default limit for the command line length. > like --disable-libjava is out of date and wrong in general now (maybe even has > been for a long time). Do you have any evidence for this? (Btw., it's --enable/disable-libgcj.) Rainer -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27963