From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-188778-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 30214 invoked by alias); 9 Jun 2006 17:47:55 -0000
Received: (qmail 29481 invoked by uid 48); 9 Jun 2006 17:47:16 -0000
Date: Fri, 09 Jun 2006 18:03:00 -0000
Message-ID: <20060609174716.29480.qmail@sourceware.org>
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
References: <bug-27979-12387@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Subject: [Bug c++/27979] 4.2 Regression] conversion check confused by enum bitfields
In-Reply-To: <bug-27979-12387@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
From: "tbm at cyrius dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2006-06/txt/msg01063.txt.bz2
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>



------- Comment #2 from tbm at cyrius dot com  2006-06-09 17:47 -------
The following, related example, fails with gcc 4.2 20060508 but works with
20060530.  It would be great if whoever works on this PR could check what
change was responsible to get this working, and if it was just an accidental
change, whether the following test case should be added to the test suite:

enum EBorderStyle {
   BNATIVE, BNONE, BHIDDEN
};

class BorderValue
{
  public:
    EBorderStyle style : 8;
};

class bar
{
    BorderValue *border;
    EBorderStyle foo() { return border ? border->style : BHIDDEN; }
};


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27979