public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug java/27985]  New: gcj fails dependant on compiler order
@ 2006-06-10 18:53 cagney at redhat dot com
  2006-06-10 20:27 ` [Bug java/27985] " cagney at redhat dot com
  2007-01-09 20:54 ` tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: cagney at redhat dot com @ 2006-06-10 18:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

[-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --]
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1046 bytes --]

It's got something to do with two occurances of the object "Action" in the
attached test vis:

cagney@nettle$ gcj -d . -I . -C one/ExitNotificationObserver.java
one/AddTaskObserverAction.java one/TaskAction.java
one/ExitNotificationObserver.java: In class 'one.ExitNotificationObserver':
one/ExitNotificationObserver.java: In constructor '()':
one/ExitNotificationObserver.java:18: error: Can't find method
‘dontSaveObject()’ in type ‘one.TaskAction’.
        myAction.dontSaveObject();
                   ^
1 error
cagney@nettle$ gcj -d . -I . -C  one/TaskAction.java
one/ExitNotificationObserver.java one/AddTaskObserverAction.java
cagney@nettle$

attachment follows


-- 
           Summary: gcj fails dependant on compiler order
           Product: gcc
           Version: 4.1.0
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: java
        AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
        ReportedBy: cagney at redhat dot com


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27985


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* [Bug java/27985] gcj fails dependant on compiler order
  2006-06-10 18:53 [Bug java/27985] New: gcj fails dependant on compiler order cagney at redhat dot com
@ 2006-06-10 20:27 ` cagney at redhat dot com
  2007-01-09 20:54 ` tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: cagney at redhat dot com @ 2006-06-10 20:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #1 from cagney at redhat dot com  2006-06-10 18:53 -------
Created an attachment (id=11649)
 --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=11649&action=view)
source code for compile


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27985


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* [Bug java/27985] gcj fails dependant on compiler order
  2006-06-10 18:53 [Bug java/27985] New: gcj fails dependant on compiler order cagney at redhat dot com
  2006-06-10 20:27 ` [Bug java/27985] " cagney at redhat dot com
@ 2007-01-09 20:54 ` tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2007-01-09 20:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #2 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org  2007-01-09 20:48 -------
All gcj front end bugs have been fixed by the gcj-eclipse branch merge.
I'm mass-closing the affected PRs.
If you believe one of these was closed in error, please reopen it
with a note explaining why.
Thanks.


-- 

tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED
   Target Milestone|---                         |4.3.0


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27985


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2007-01-09 20:54 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2006-06-10 18:53 [Bug java/27985] New: gcj fails dependant on compiler order cagney at redhat dot com
2006-06-10 20:27 ` [Bug java/27985] " cagney at redhat dot com
2007-01-09 20:54 ` tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).