From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 20765 invoked by alias); 13 Jun 2006 12:52:32 -0000 Received: (qmail 20588 invoked by uid 48); 13 Jun 2006 12:52:25 -0000 Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2006 13:06:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20060613125225.20587.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug java/1305] [JSR133] GCJ ignores volatile modifier In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "aph at gcc dot gnu dot org" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2006-06/txt/msg01262.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Comment #8 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-13 12:52 ------- Note that this patch has some problems. In particular, it doesn't work with BC-compiled code. Also, on x86 it doesn't insert memory barrier instructions, but this is arguably a bug in __sync_synchronize() rather than a problem with this patch. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1305