From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 13327 invoked by alias); 20 Jun 2006 16:59:28 -0000 Received: (qmail 13310 invoked by alias); 20 Jun 2006 16:59:21 -0000 Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2006 17:37:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20060620165921.13309.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug bootstrap/28066] cannot bootstrap x86_64 gcc 4.1.1 from gcc 3.4.5 In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "jeremy dot gorman at ngc dot com" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2006-06/txt/msg01864.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Comment #2 from jeremy dot gorman at ngc dot com 2006-06-20 16:59 ------- Subject: RE: cannot bootstrap x86_64 gcc 4.1.1 from gcc 3.4.5 Thank you, In this case, which binutil version is required? Can you refer me to the (fixed) binutil bug that's causing my problem, please? -Jeremy -----Original Message----- From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org [mailto:gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org] Sent: Friday, June 16, 2006 2:28 PM To: Gorman, Jeremy Subject: [Bug bootstrap/28066] cannot bootstrap x86_64 gcc 4.1.1 from gcc 3.4.5 ------- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-16 21:27 ------- /usr/bin/ld: BFD 2.15.92.0.2 20040927 internal error, aborting at ../../bfd/elf64-x86-64.c line 1912 in elf64_x86_64_relocate_section But this is a binutils bug and not a GCC one and it has been fixed too. -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What |Removed |Added ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ---- Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution| |INVALID http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28066 ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28066