From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-189633-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 28681 invoked by alias); 20 Jun 2006 23:45:14 -0000
Received: (qmail 28578 invoked by uid 48); 20 Jun 2006 23:45:06 -0000
Date: Wed, 21 Jun 2006 00:01:00 -0000
Message-ID: <20060620234506.28576.qmail@sourceware.org>
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
References: <bug-25072-6642@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Subject: [Bug fortran/25072] non PURE function used in For-All
In-Reply-To: <bug-25072-6642@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
From: "pault at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2006-06/txt/msg01918.txt.bz2
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>



------- Comment #6 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org  2006-06-20 23:45 -------
The line

+       sym->attr.flavor = FL_UNKNOWN;

breaks too much - mainly intrinsics.

+       sym->attr.flavor = FL_PROCEDURE;

is in the final stages of regtesting, as I head off to bed.  It looks OK.

Paul


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25072