* [Bug target/28183] [4.0/4.1/4.2 regression] assembler error "FATAL: can't close x.o" on m68k with new binutils
2006-06-27 21:24 [Bug target/28183] New: [4.0/4.1/4.2 regression] assembler error "FATAL: can't close x.o" on m68k with new binutils tbm at cyrius dot com
@ 2006-06-27 22:21 ` tbm at cyrius dot com
2006-06-28 4:50 ` tbm at cyrius dot com
` (7 subsequent siblings)
8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: tbm at cyrius dot com @ 2006-06-27 22:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #1 from tbm at cyrius dot com 2006-06-27 22:08 -------
Created an attachment (id=11766)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=11766&action=view)
preprocessed source
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28183
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/28183] [4.0/4.1/4.2 regression] assembler error "FATAL: can't close x.o" on m68k with new binutils
2006-06-27 21:24 [Bug target/28183] New: [4.0/4.1/4.2 regression] assembler error "FATAL: can't close x.o" on m68k with new binutils tbm at cyrius dot com
2006-06-27 22:21 ` [Bug target/28183] " tbm at cyrius dot com
@ 2006-06-28 4:50 ` tbm at cyrius dot com
2006-06-28 11:21 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (6 subsequent siblings)
8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: tbm at cyrius dot com @ 2006-06-28 4:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #2 from tbm at cyrius dot com 2006-06-27 22:21 -------
What I said about binutils might be wrong. It seems it's not due to a
difference in the version, but due to one being native and one being cross. I
just upgraded the binutils-m68k on i386 to the same version as that on m68k
native and strangely enough the same .s file works on i386 with m68k-as but
fails on m68k:
native:
crest% as test.s
a.out: No error
test.s: Assembler messages:
test.s:18960: FATAL: can't close a.out
: No error
crest% as --version
GNU assembler 2.16.91 20060413 Debian GNU/Linux
Copyright 2005 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
This program is free software; you may redistribute it under the terms of
the GNU General Public License. This program has absolutely no warranty.
This assembler was configured for a target of `m68k-linux-gnu'.
crest%
i386:
1173:tbm@reyes: ~] /usr/local/bin/m68k-linux-gnu-as test.s
1174:tbm@reyes: ~] /usr/local/bin/m68k-linux-gnu-as --version
GNU assembler 2.16.91 20060413 Debian GNU/Linux
Copyright 2005 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
This program is free software; you may redistribute it under the terms of
the GNU General Public License. This program has absolutely no warranty.
This assembler was configured for a target of `m68k-linux-gnu'.
1175:tbm@reyes: ~]
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28183
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/28183] [4.0/4.1/4.2 regression] assembler error "FATAL: can't close x.o" on m68k with new binutils
2006-06-27 21:24 [Bug target/28183] New: [4.0/4.1/4.2 regression] assembler error "FATAL: can't close x.o" on m68k with new binutils tbm at cyrius dot com
2006-06-27 22:21 ` [Bug target/28183] " tbm at cyrius dot com
2006-06-28 4:50 ` tbm at cyrius dot com
@ 2006-06-28 11:21 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-08-07 23:12 ` schwab at suse dot de
` (5 subsequent siblings)
8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-06-28 11:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-28 11:15 -------
(In reply to comment #2)
That would almost mean as is being miscompiled on m68k.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Keywords| |wrong-code
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28183
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/28183] [4.0/4.1/4.2 regression] assembler error "FATAL: can't close x.o" on m68k with new binutils
2006-06-27 21:24 [Bug target/28183] New: [4.0/4.1/4.2 regression] assembler error "FATAL: can't close x.o" on m68k with new binutils tbm at cyrius dot com
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2006-06-28 11:21 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2006-08-07 23:12 ` schwab at suse dot de
2006-08-07 23:13 ` schwab at suse dot de
` (4 subsequent siblings)
8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: schwab at suse dot de @ 2006-08-07 23:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #4 from schwab at suse dot de 2006-08-07 23:12 -------
The removed comment says:
- /* If will do cse, generate all results into pseudo registers
- since 1) that allows cse to find more things
- and 2) otherwise cse could produce an insn the machine
- cannot support. An exception is a CONSTRUCTOR into a multi-word
- MEM: that's much more likely to be most efficient into the MEM.
- Another is a CALL_EXPR which must return in memory. */
So it looks like point 2 is true.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28183
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/28183] [4.0/4.1/4.2 regression] assembler error "FATAL: can't close x.o" on m68k with new binutils
2006-06-27 21:24 [Bug target/28183] New: [4.0/4.1/4.2 regression] assembler error "FATAL: can't close x.o" on m68k with new binutils tbm at cyrius dot com
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2006-08-07 23:12 ` schwab at suse dot de
@ 2006-08-07 23:13 ` schwab at suse dot de
2006-09-10 16:56 ` jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (3 subsequent siblings)
8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: schwab at suse dot de @ 2006-08-07 23:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #5 from schwab at suse dot de 2006-08-07 23:13 -------
Sorry, wrong bug.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28183
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/28183] [4.0/4.1/4.2 regression] assembler error "FATAL: can't close x.o" on m68k with new binutils
2006-06-27 21:24 [Bug target/28183] New: [4.0/4.1/4.2 regression] assembler error "FATAL: can't close x.o" on m68k with new binutils tbm at cyrius dot com
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2006-08-07 23:13 ` schwab at suse dot de
@ 2006-09-10 16:56 ` jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-09-20 22:24 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (2 subsequent siblings)
8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-09-10 16:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
--
jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|--- |4.0.4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28183
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/28183] [4.0/4.1/4.2 regression] assembler error "FATAL: can't close x.o" on m68k with new binutils
2006-06-27 21:24 [Bug target/28183] New: [4.0/4.1/4.2 regression] assembler error "FATAL: can't close x.o" on m68k with new binutils tbm at cyrius dot com
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2006-09-10 16:56 ` jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2006-09-20 22:24 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-01-31 18:20 ` [Bug target/28183] [4.0/4.1/4.2/4.3 " zippel at linux-m68k dot org
2007-01-31 18:27 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-09-20 22:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Priority|P3 |P5
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28183
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/28183] [4.0/4.1/4.2/4.3 regression] assembler error "FATAL: can't close x.o" on m68k with new binutils
2006-06-27 21:24 [Bug target/28183] New: [4.0/4.1/4.2 regression] assembler error "FATAL: can't close x.o" on m68k with new binutils tbm at cyrius dot com
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2006-09-20 22:24 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2007-01-31 18:20 ` zippel at linux-m68k dot org
2007-01-31 18:27 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: zippel at linux-m68k dot org @ 2007-01-31 18:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #6 from zippel at linux-m68k dot org 2007-01-31 18:20 -------
This bug can be closed, it's really a bug in binutils triggered by some inline
assembly in cln. Here is a bit more info:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=388000
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28183
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/28183] [4.0/4.1/4.2/4.3 regression] assembler error "FATAL: can't close x.o" on m68k with new binutils
2006-06-27 21:24 [Bug target/28183] New: [4.0/4.1/4.2 regression] assembler error "FATAL: can't close x.o" on m68k with new binutils tbm at cyrius dot com
` (7 preceding siblings ...)
2007-01-31 18:20 ` [Bug target/28183] [4.0/4.1/4.2/4.3 " zippel at linux-m68k dot org
@ 2007-01-31 18:27 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2007-01-31 18:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #7 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-31 18:27 -------
Marking as invalid as requested.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution| |INVALID
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28183
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread