public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug fortran/27470] New: [4.1 4.2 regression] wong memory allocator for derived types
@ 2006-05-07 9:41 tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-05-07 17:31 ` [Bug fortran/27470] [4.1/4.2 " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (13 more replies)
0 siblings, 14 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-05-07 9:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
The following code
TYPE foo
INTEGER, DIMENSION(:), POINTER :: array
END TYPE foo
type(foo),allocatable,dimension(:) :: mol
integer :: i, n
n = 10
ALLOCATE (mol(n))
ALLOCATE (mol(1)%array(5))
END
calls _gfortran_allocate_array for the second allocation, which
is wrong and can lead to segfault.
The problem is in gfc_array_allocate, where the check for
expr->symtree->n.sym->attr.allocatable
refers to mol, not to mol(1)%array.
This one is tricky.
--
Summary: [4.1 4.2 regression] wong memory allocator for derived
types
Product: gcc
Version: 4.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: wrong-code
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27470
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/27470] [4.1/4.2 regression] wong memory allocator for derived types
2006-05-07 9:41 [Bug fortran/27470] New: [4.1 4.2 regression] wong memory allocator for derived types tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2006-05-07 17:31 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-05-07 19:36 ` tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (12 subsequent siblings)
13 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-05-07 17:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-07 17:31 -------
I wonder how related this is to PR 27411.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot
| |org
BugsThisDependsOn| |27411
Summary|[4.1 4.2 regression] wong |[4.1/4.2 regression] wong
|memory allocator for derived|memory allocator for derived
|types |types
Target Milestone|--- |4.1.1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27470
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/27470] [4.1/4.2 regression] wong memory allocator for derived types
2006-05-07 9:41 [Bug fortran/27470] New: [4.1 4.2 regression] wong memory allocator for derived types tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-05-07 17:31 ` [Bug fortran/27470] [4.1/4.2 " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2006-05-07 19:36 ` tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-05-08 21:06 ` [Bug fortran/27470] [4.1/4.2 regression] wrong " tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (11 subsequent siblings)
13 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-05-07 19:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #2 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-07 19:36 -------
(In reply to comment #1)
> I wonder how related this is to PR 27411.
As far as I can see, there's no relationship. To my eye, this looks
like a stand-alone bug :-)
Summary of what goes wrong:
gfc_array_allocate needs to differentiate between pointer and
allocatable arrays because it needs to call _gfortran_allocate_array for
allocatable arrays and _gfortran_allocate for pointers. The difference
is that, for an allocatable array, it is an error if the allocatable
array is already allocated. For pointers, it's ok (it potentially
leaks memory, though).
The test wether this is an allocatable array is done via
expr->symtree->n.sym->attr.allocatable, which is fine for non-derived
types. The test case exposes a problem, that "mol" is allocatable,
mol%array is a pointer, and what we get via expr->symtree->... is
the array and not the pointer. Apparently, we need to look somewhere
else for that information, but I haven't found out where yet.
Here is a test case which actually provokes a runtime error:
TYPE foo
INTEGER, DIMENSION(:), POINTER :: array
END TYPE foo
type(foo),allocatable,dimension(:) :: mol
ALLOCATE (mol(1))
mol = transfer(-1, mol) ! Initialize the array with garbage
ALLOCATE (mol(1)%array(5)) ! Fails with "Attempting to allocate already
allocated array"
END
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27470
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/27470] [4.1/4.2 regression] wrong memory allocator for derived types
2006-05-07 9:41 [Bug fortran/27470] New: [4.1 4.2 regression] wong memory allocator for derived types tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-05-07 17:31 ` [Bug fortran/27470] [4.1/4.2 " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-05-07 19:36 ` tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2006-05-08 21:06 ` tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-05-08 22:00 ` tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (10 subsequent siblings)
13 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-05-08 21:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #3 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-08 21:06 -------
Here's a test case that does not require transfer:
TYPE foo
INTEGER, DIMENSION(:), POINTER :: array
END TYPE foo
type(foo),allocatable,dimension(:) :: mol
ALLOCATE (mol(1))
ALLOCATE (mol(1)%array(5))
ALLOCATE (mol(1)%array(5))
END
This shouldn't error out with "Attempting to allocate already allocated array".
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27470
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/27470] [4.1/4.2 regression] wrong memory allocator for derived types
2006-05-07 9:41 [Bug fortran/27470] New: [4.1 4.2 regression] wong memory allocator for derived types tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2006-05-08 21:06 ` [Bug fortran/27470] [4.1/4.2 regression] wrong " tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2006-05-08 22:00 ` tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-05-08 22:11 ` tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (9 subsequent siblings)
13 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-05-08 22:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #4 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-08 21:59 -------
Created an attachment (id=11415)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=11415&action=view)
patch
This fixes the regression. It isn't pretty, because it would need
to be changed as part of an implementation of allocatable components.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27470
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/27470] [4.1/4.2 regression] wrong memory allocator for derived types
2006-05-07 9:41 [Bug fortran/27470] New: [4.1 4.2 regression] wong memory allocator for derived types tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2006-05-08 22:00 ` tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2006-05-08 22:11 ` tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-05-10 18:27 ` tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (8 subsequent siblings)
13 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-05-08 22:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #5 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-08 22:11 -------
Created an attachment (id=11416)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=11416&action=view)
better patch
Forgot to initialize a variable in the earlier attempt.
This one looks OK.
--
tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Attachment #11415|0 |1
is obsolete| |
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot
|dot org |org
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27470
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/27470] [4.1/4.2 regression] wrong memory allocator for derived types
2006-05-07 9:41 [Bug fortran/27470] New: [4.1 4.2 regression] wong memory allocator for derived types tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2006-05-08 22:11 ` tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2006-05-10 18:27 ` tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-05-14 22:35 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (7 subsequent siblings)
13 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-05-10 18:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #6 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-10 18:27 -------
Subject: Bug 27470
Author: tkoenig
Date: Wed May 10 18:26:51 2006
New Revision: 113680
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=113680
Log:
2005-05-10 Thomas Koenig <Thomas.Koenig@online.de>
PR fortran/27470
* trans-array.c(gfc_array_allocate): If ref->next exists
that is if there is a statement like ALLOCATE(foo%bar(2)),
F95 rules require that bar should be a pointer.
2005-05-10 Thomas Koenig <Thomas.Koenig@online.de>
PR fortran/27470
* gfortran.dg/multiple_allocation_2.f90: New test case.
Added:
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/multiple_allocation_2.f90
Modified:
trunk/gcc/fortran/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/fortran/trans-array.c
trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27470
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/27470] [4.1/4.2 regression] wrong memory allocator for derived types
2006-05-07 9:41 [Bug fortran/27470] New: [4.1 4.2 regression] wong memory allocator for derived types tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2006-05-10 18:27 ` tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2006-05-14 22:35 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-05-15 19:39 ` patchapp at dberlin dot org
` (6 subsequent siblings)
13 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-05-14 22:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #7 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-14 22:34 -------
P5: F95 is not release-critical.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Priority|P3 |P5
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27470
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/27470] [4.1/4.2 regression] wrong memory allocator for derived types
2006-05-07 9:41 [Bug fortran/27470] New: [4.1 4.2 regression] wong memory allocator for derived types tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2006-05-14 22:35 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2006-05-15 19:39 ` patchapp at dberlin dot org
2006-05-25 2:47 ` [Bug fortran/27470] [4.1 " mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (5 subsequent siblings)
13 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: patchapp at dberlin dot org @ 2006-05-15 19:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #8 from patchapp at dberlin dot org 2006-05-15 19:38 -------
Subject: Bug number PR 27470
A patch for this bug has been added to the patch tracker.
The mailing list url for the patch is
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-05/msg00365.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27470
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/27470] [4.1 regression] wrong memory allocator for derived types
2006-05-07 9:41 [Bug fortran/27470] New: [4.1 4.2 regression] wong memory allocator for derived types tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (7 preceding siblings ...)
2006-05-15 19:39 ` patchapp at dberlin dot org
@ 2006-05-25 2:47 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-05-27 21:25 ` tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (4 subsequent siblings)
13 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-05-25 2:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #9 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-25 02:36 -------
Will not be fixed in 4.1.1; adjust target milestone to 4.1.2.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|4.1.1 |4.1.2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27470
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/27470] [4.1 regression] wrong memory allocator for derived types
2006-05-07 9:41 [Bug fortran/27470] New: [4.1 4.2 regression] wong memory allocator for derived types tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (8 preceding siblings ...)
2006-05-25 2:47 ` [Bug fortran/27470] [4.1 " mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2006-05-27 21:25 ` tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-05-28 12:33 ` tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (3 subsequent siblings)
13 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-05-27 21:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #10 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-27 21:25 -------
I applied the patch to the 4.1 branch, and I have a strange "regression":
When running "make check-fortran", I get
Running target unix
Using /usr/share/dejagnu/baseboards/unix.exp as board description file for
target.
Using /usr/share/dejagnu/config/unix.exp as generic interface file for target.
Using /home/ig25/gcc/branches/gcc-4_1-branch/gcc/testsuite/config/default.exp
as tool-and-target-specific interface file.
Running /home/ig25/gcc/branches/gcc-4_1-branch/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/dg.exp
...
FAIL: gfortran.dg/io_constraints_2.f90 -O (test for errors, line 61)
FAIL: gfortran.dg/io_constraints_2.f90 -O (test for excess errors)
got a INT signal, interrupted by user
=== gfortran Summary ===
# of expected passes 6807
# of unexpected failures 2
# of expected failures 11
# of unsupported tests 16
(although it is hard to see how that came about).
When I run just that test case, I get
$ make -k check-gfortran RUNTESTFLAGS="dg.exp=gfortran.dg/io_constraints_2.f90"
test -d testsuite || mkdir testsuite
test -d testsuite/gfortran || mkdir testsuite/gfortran
(rootme=`${PWDCMD-pwd}`; export rootme; \
srcdir=`cd ../../../../gcc/branches/gcc-4_1-branch/gcc; ${PWDCMD-pwd}`
; export srcdir ; \
cd testsuite/gfortran; \
rm -f tmp-site.exp; \
sed '/set tmpdir/ s|testsuite|testsuite/gfortran|' \
< ../../site.exp > tmp-site.exp; \
/bin/sh ${srcdir}/../move-if-change tmp-site.exp site.exp; \
EXPECT=`if [ -f ${rootme}/../expect/expect ] ; then echo
${rootme}/../expect/expect ; else echo expect ; fi` ; export EXPECT ; \
if [ -f ${rootme}/../expect/expect ] ; then \
TCL_LIBRARY=`cd .. ; cd ${srcdir}/../tcl/library ; ${PWDCMD-pwd}` ;
\
export TCL_LIBRARY ; fi ; \
`if [ -f ${srcdir}/../dejagnu/runtest ] ; then echo
${srcdir}/../dejagnu/runtest ; else echo runtest; fi` --tool gfortran
dg.exp=gfortran.dg/io_constraints_2.f90)
site.exp is unchanged
Test Run By ig25 on Sat May 27 23:22:53 2006
Native configuration is i686-pc-linux-gnu
=== gfortran tests ===
Schedule of variations:
unix
Running target unix
Using /usr/share/dejagnu/baseboards/unix.exp as board description file for
target.
Using /usr/share/dejagnu/config/unix.exp as generic interface file for target.
Using /home/ig25/gcc/branches/gcc-4_1-branch/gcc/testsuite/config/default.exp
as tool-and-target-specific interface file.
Running /home/ig25/gcc/branches/gcc-4_1-branch/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/dg.exp
...
=== gfortran Summary ===
# of expected passes 18
/home/ig25/gcc-bin/branches/gcc-4_1-branch/gcc/testsuite/gfortran/../../gfortran
version 4.1.2 20060527 (prerelease)
Not committing right now.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27470
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/27470] [4.1 regression] wrong memory allocator for derived types
2006-05-07 9:41 [Bug fortran/27470] New: [4.1 4.2 regression] wong memory allocator for derived types tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (9 preceding siblings ...)
2006-05-27 21:25 ` tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2006-05-28 12:33 ` tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-05-28 20:36 ` tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (2 subsequent siblings)
13 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-05-28 12:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #11 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-28 12:33 -------
(In reply to comment #10)
>
> Not committing right now.
Downloading a fresh version via svn cured that problem.
I'd have commited the patch by now, but for some strange reason,
I get "Authentication failed" errors with svn, and my E-Mails to
the gcc and fortran mailing lists also don't go through.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27470
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/27470] [4.1 regression] wrong memory allocator for derived types
2006-05-07 9:41 [Bug fortran/27470] New: [4.1 4.2 regression] wong memory allocator for derived types tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (10 preceding siblings ...)
2006-05-28 12:33 ` tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2006-05-28 20:36 ` tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-05-28 20:37 ` tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-06-28 18:50 ` jjcogliati-r1 at yahoo dot com
13 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-05-28 20:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #12 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-28 20:36 -------
Subject: Bug 27470
Author: tkoenig
Date: Sun May 28 20:35:53 2006
New Revision: 114176
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=114176
Log:
2005-05-28 Thomas Koenig <Thomas.Koenig@online.de>
PR fortran/27470
Backport from trunk.
* trans-array.c(gfc_array_allocate): If ref->next exists
that is if there is a statement like ALLOCATE(foo%bar(2)),
F95 rules require that bar should be a pointer.
2005-05-28 Thomas Koenig <Thomas.Koenig@online.de>
PR fortran/27470
Backport from trunk.
* gfortran.dg/multiple_allocation_2.f90: New test case.
Added:
branches/gcc-4_1-branch/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/multiple_allocation_2.f90
Modified:
branches/gcc-4_1-branch/gcc/fortran/ChangeLog
branches/gcc-4_1-branch/gcc/fortran/trans-array.c
branches/gcc-4_1-branch/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27470
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/27470] [4.1 regression] wrong memory allocator for derived types
2006-05-07 9:41 [Bug fortran/27470] New: [4.1 4.2 regression] wong memory allocator for derived types tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (11 preceding siblings ...)
2006-05-28 20:36 ` tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2006-05-28 20:37 ` tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-06-28 18:50 ` jjcogliati-r1 at yahoo dot com
13 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-05-28 20:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #13 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-28 20:37 -------
Fixed on trunk and 4.1.
Closing.
--
tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27470
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/27470] [4.1 regression] wrong memory allocator for derived types
2006-05-07 9:41 [Bug fortran/27470] New: [4.1 4.2 regression] wong memory allocator for derived types tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (12 preceding siblings ...)
2006-05-28 20:37 ` tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2006-06-28 18:50 ` jjcogliati-r1 at yahoo dot com
13 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: jjcogliati-r1 at yahoo dot com @ 2006-06-28 18:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #14 from jjcogliati-r1 at yahoo dot com 2006-06-28 18:02 -------
This works in 4.1.0, so only 4.1.1 has this bug so far as I can tell.
--
jjcogliati-r1 at yahoo dot com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |jjcogliati-r1 at yahoo dot
| |com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27470
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2006-06-28 18:02 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2006-05-07 9:41 [Bug fortran/27470] New: [4.1 4.2 regression] wong memory allocator for derived types tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-05-07 17:31 ` [Bug fortran/27470] [4.1/4.2 " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-05-07 19:36 ` tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-05-08 21:06 ` [Bug fortran/27470] [4.1/4.2 regression] wrong " tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-05-08 22:00 ` tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-05-08 22:11 ` tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-05-10 18:27 ` tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-05-14 22:35 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-05-15 19:39 ` patchapp at dberlin dot org
2006-05-25 2:47 ` [Bug fortran/27470] [4.1 " mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-05-27 21:25 ` tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-05-28 12:33 ` tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-05-28 20:36 ` tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-05-28 20:37 ` tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-06-28 18:50 ` jjcogliati-r1 at yahoo dot com
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).