[Bug c/28137] New: "make check" gets 10 FAIL reports with gcc.dg/c99-typespec-1.c

[Bug c/28137] New: "make check" gets 10 FAIL reports with gcc.dg/c99-typespec-1.c

[duncan_roe at acslink dot net dot au]

Configured as follows:

unset ARCH SRC TARGET
ARCH=amd64
SRC=/usr/src/gcc-4.1.1
ARCH=${ARCH:-i486}
TARGET=${TARGET:-$ARCH-pc-linux-gnu}
(time nice $SRC/configure \
  --prefix=/usr/local64/gcc402 \
  --enable-shared \
  --enable-threads=posix \
  --enable-__cxa_atexit \
  --disable-checking \
  --with-gnu-ld \
  --target=${TARGET} \
  --host=${TARGET} \
  --build=${TARGET} \
  )2>&1|tee heeconf
unset ARCH SRC TARGET

then make bootstrap; make -j 8 check gives these 10 failures:

FAIL: gcc.dg/c99-typespec-1.c unsigned long long int int (test for errors, line
1157)
FAIL: gcc.dg/c99-typespec-1.c unsigned long long int long (test for errors,
line 1158)
FAIL: gcc.dg/c99-typespec-1.c unsigned long long int float (test for errors,
line 1159)
FAIL: gcc.dg/c99-typespec-1.c unsigned long long int double (test for errors,
line 1160)
FAIL: gcc.dg/c99-typespec-1.c unsigned long long int signed (test for errors,
line 1161)
FAIL: gcc.dg/c99-typespec-1.c unsigned long long int unsigned (test for errors,
line 1162)
FAIL: gcc.dg/c99-typespec-1.c unsigned long long int _Bool (test for errors,
line 1163)
FAIL: gcc.dg/c99-typespec-1.c unsigned long long int _Complex (test for errors,
line 1164)
FAIL: gcc.dg/c99-typespec-1.c (test for excess errors)
FAIL: gcc.dg/visibility-11.c scan-assembler memcpy@PLT

System is dual Opteron with 4GB RAM (3.5GB usable owing to stupid BIOS)


-- 
           Summary: "make check" gets 10 FAIL reports with gcc.dg/c99-
                    typespec-1.c
           Product: gcc
           Version: 4.1.1
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: c
        AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
        ReportedBy: duncan_roe at acslink dot net dot au
 GCC build triplet: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
  GCC host triplet: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
GCC target triplet: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28137

[Bug target/28137] "make check" gets 10 FAIL reports with gcc.dg/c99-typespec-1.c

[pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org]

------- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2006-06-22 12:36 -------
FAIL: gcc.dg/c99-typespec-1.c (test for excess errors)

Sounds like there is an ICE going on.


-- 

pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
          Component|c                           |target


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28137

[Bug target/28137] "make check" gets 10 FAIL reports with gcc.dg/c99-typespec-1.c

[joseph at codesourcery dot com]

------- Comment #2 from joseph at codesourcery dot com  2006-06-22 14:27 -------
Subject: Re:  "make check" gets 10 FAIL reports with
 gcc.dg/c99-typespec-1.c

On Thu, 22 Jun 2006, pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:

> FAIL: gcc.dg/c99-typespec-1.c (test for excess errors)
> 
> Sounds like there is an ICE going on.

It sounds to me a lot move like someone using a version of expect without 
HJ's patch (bug 12096).


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28137

[Bug target/28137] "make check" gets 10 FAIL reports with gcc.dg/c99-typespec-1.c

[duncan_roe at acslink dot net dot au]

------- Comment #3 from duncan_roe at acslink dot net dot au  2006-06-22 21:21 -------
I have expect 5.41. HJ's patch is not yet accepted by the expect folks - they
believe the problem may have its roots in Tcl.
So I will try applying the patch and re-running make check.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28137

[Bug target/28137] "make check" gets 10 FAIL reports with gcc.dg/c99-typespec-1.c

[duncan_roe at acslink dot net dot au]

------- Comment #4 from duncan_roe at acslink dot net dot au  2006-06-25 05:53 -------
HJ's patch can still be applied to expect-5.43 (but I wasted some time before I
realised you must use --ignore-whitespace). This *does* reduce the number of
errors reported, but one error remains:

FAIL: gcc.dg/visibility-11.c scan-assembler memcpy@PLT

Also "make check" seemed to test more things when I changed ARCH from amd64 to
x86_64. So now the config line is:
ARCH=x86_64
SRC=/usr/src/gcc-4.1.1
ARCH=${ARCH:-i486}
TARGET=${TARGET:-$ARCH-pc-linux-gnu}
$SRC/configure \
  --prefix=/usr/local64/gcc402 \
  --enable-shared \
  --enable-threads=posix \
  --enable-__cxa_atexit \
  --disable-checking \
  --with-gnu-ld \
  --target=${TARGET} \
  --host=${TARGET} \
  --build=${TARGET}

I guess amd64 should not be used then?


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28137

[Bug target/28137] "make check" gets 10 FAIL reports with gcc.dg/c99-typespec-1.c

[pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org]

------- Comment #5 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2006-06-29 00:30 -------
(In reply to comment #4)
> FAIL: gcc.dg/visibility-11.c scan-assembler memcpy@PLT

Yes this one is known.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28137

[Bug target/28137] "make check" gets 10 FAIL reports with gcc.dg/c99-typespec-1.c

[pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org]

------- Comment #6 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2006-09-03 07:30 -------
(In reply to comment #5)
> (In reply to comment #4)
> > FAIL: gcc.dg/visibility-11.c scan-assembler memcpy@PLT
> 
> Yes this one is known.
And that was fixed by:
2006-07-24  Uros Bizjak  <uros@kss-loka.si>

        * gcc.dg/visibility-11.c: Enlarge test array to 1024 bytes to
        avoid memcpy optimization.


-- 

pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED
   Target Milestone|---                         |4.1.2


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28137