public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "hjl at lucon dot org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/27827] [4.0/4.1/4.2 Regression] gcc 4 produces worse x87 code on all platforms than gcc 3
Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2006 04:18:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060629023229.16292.qmail@sourceware.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-27827-12761@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>



------- Comment #27 from hjl at lucon dot org  2006-06-29 02:32 -------
Created an attachment (id=11777)
 --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=11777&action=view)
An integer loop

I changed the loop from double to long long. The 64bit code generated by gcc
4.0
is 10% slower than gcc 3.4 on Nocona:

/usr/gcc-3.4/bin/gcc -m32 -fomit-frame-pointer -O -c mmbench.c
/usr/gcc-3.4/bin/gcc -m32 -fomit-frame-pointer -O -c gemm_atlas.c
/usr/gcc-3.4/bin/gcc -m32 -fomit-frame-pointer -O -o xmm_gcc mmbench.o
gemm_atlas.o
rm -f *.o
/usr/gcc-4.0/bin/gcc -m32 -fomit-frame-pointer -O -c mmbench.c
/usr/gcc-4.0/bin/gcc -m32 -fomit-frame-pointer -O -c gemm_atlas.c
/usr/gcc-4.0/bin/gcc -m32 -fomit-frame-pointer -O -o xmm_gc4 mmbench.o
gemm_atlas.o
rm -f *.o
echo "GCC 3.x     performance:"
GCC 3.x     performance:
./xmm_gcc
ALGORITHM     NB   REPS        TIME      MFLOPS
=========  =====  =====  ==========  ==========

atlasmm       60    250       0.381      283.51

echo "GCC 4.x     performance:"
GCC 4.x     performance:
./xmm_gc4
ALGORITHM     NB   REPS        TIME      MFLOPS
=========  =====  =====  ==========  ==========

atlasmm       60    250       0.389      277.68

gnu-16:pts/2[5]> make                                     ~/bugs/gcc/27827/loop
/usr/gcc-3.4/bin/gcc -DREPS=1000 -fomit-frame-pointer -O -c mmbench.c
/usr/gcc-3.4/bin/gcc -DREPS=1000 -fomit-frame-pointer -O -c gemm_atlas.c
/usr/gcc-3.4/bin/gcc -DREPS=1000 -fomit-frame-pointer -O -o xmm_gcc mmbench.o
gemm_atlas.o
rm -f *.o
/usr/gcc-4.0/bin/gcc -DREPS=1000 -fomit-frame-pointer -O -c mmbench.c
/usr/gcc-4.0/bin/gcc -DREPS=1000 -fomit-frame-pointer -O -c gemm_atlas.c
/usr/gcc-4.0/bin/gcc -DREPS=1000 -fomit-frame-pointer -O -o xmm_gc4 mmbench.o
gemm_atlas.o
rm -f *.o
echo "GCC 3.x     performance:"
GCC 3.x     performance:
./xmm_gcc
ALGORITHM     NB   REPS        TIME      MFLOPS
=========  =====  =====  ==========  ==========

atlasmm       60   1000       0.172     2512.01

echo "GCC 4.x     performance:"
GCC 4.x     performance:
./xmm_gc4
ALGORITHM     NB   REPS        TIME      MFLOPS
=========  =====  =====  ==========  ==========

atlasmm       60   1000       0.193     2238.68

So the problem may be also loop related.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27827


  parent reply	other threads:[~2006-06-29  2:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 75+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-05-31  0:33 [Bug rtl-optimization/27827] New: " hiclint at gmail dot com
2006-05-31  0:35 ` [Bug rtl-optimization/27827] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-05-31  0:36 ` hiclint at gmail dot com
2006-05-31  0:42 ` [Bug target/27827] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-05-31  0:50 ` hiclint at gmail dot com
2006-05-31  0:55 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-05-31  1:09 ` whaley at cs dot utsa dot edu
2006-05-31 10:57 ` uros at kss-loka dot si
2006-05-31 14:13 ` whaley at cs dot utsa dot edu
2006-06-01  8:43 ` uros at kss-loka dot si
2006-06-01 16:03 ` whaley at cs dot utsa dot edu
2006-06-01 16:26 ` whaley at cs dot utsa dot edu
2006-06-01 18:43 ` whaley at cs dot utsa dot edu
2006-06-07 22:39 ` whaley at cs dot utsa dot edu
2006-06-14  3:04 ` whaley at cs dot utsa dot edu
2006-06-24 18:11 ` whaley at cs dot utsa dot edu
2006-06-24 19:13 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-06-25 13:35 ` whaley at cs dot utsa dot edu
2006-06-25 23:05 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-06-26  1:12 ` whaley at cs dot utsa dot edu
2006-06-26  7:53 ` uros at kss-loka dot si
2006-06-26 16:02 ` whaley at cs dot utsa dot edu
2006-06-27  6:05 ` uros at kss-loka dot si
2006-06-27 14:37 ` whaley at cs dot utsa dot edu
2006-06-27 17:47 ` whaley at cs dot utsa dot edu
2006-06-28 17:37 ` [Bug target/27827] [4.0/4.1/4.2 Regression] " steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-06-28 20:18 ` whaley at cs dot utsa dot edu
2006-06-29  4:18 ` hjl at lucon dot org [this message]
2006-06-29  6:43 ` whaley at cs dot utsa dot edu
2006-07-04 13:15 ` whaley at cs dot utsa dot edu
2006-07-05 17:55 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-08-04  7:46 ` bonzini at gnu dot org
2006-08-04 16:24 ` whaley at cs dot utsa dot edu
2006-08-05  7:21 ` bonzini at gnu dot org
2006-08-05 14:24 ` whaley at cs dot utsa dot edu
2006-08-05 17:16 ` bonzini at gnu dot org
2006-08-05 18:26 ` whaley at cs dot utsa dot edu
2006-08-06 15:03 ` [Bug target/27827] [4.0/4.1 " whaley at cs dot utsa dot edu
2006-08-07  6:19 ` bonzini at gnu dot org
2006-08-07 15:32 ` whaley at cs dot utsa dot edu
2006-08-07 16:47 ` whaley at cs dot utsa dot edu
2006-08-07 16:58 ` paolo dot bonzini at lu dot unisi dot ch
2006-08-07 17:19 ` whaley at cs dot utsa dot edu
2006-08-07 18:19 ` paolo dot bonzini at lu dot unisi dot ch
2006-08-07 20:35 ` dorit at il dot ibm dot com
2006-08-07 21:57 ` whaley at cs dot utsa dot edu
2006-08-08  2:59 ` whaley at cs dot utsa dot edu
2006-08-08  6:15 ` hubicka at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-08-08  6:28   ` Jan Hubicka
2006-08-08  6:29 ` hubicka at ucw dot cz
2006-08-08  7:05 ` paolo dot bonzini at lu dot unisi dot ch
2006-08-08 16:44 ` whaley at cs dot utsa dot edu
2006-08-08 18:36 ` whaley at cs dot utsa dot edu
2006-08-09  4:34 ` paolo dot bonzini at lu dot unisi dot ch
2006-08-09 14:33 ` whaley at cs dot utsa dot edu
2006-08-09 15:52 ` whaley at cs dot utsa dot edu
2006-08-09 16:08 ` whaley at cs dot utsa dot edu
2006-08-09 19:10   ` Dorit Nuzman
2006-08-09 19:10 ` dorit at il dot ibm dot com
2006-08-09 21:33 ` whaley at cs dot utsa dot edu
2006-08-09 21:46   ` Andrew Pinski
2006-08-09 21:46 ` pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu
2006-08-09 23:02 ` whaley at cs dot utsa dot edu
2006-08-10  6:52 ` paolo dot bonzini at lu dot unisi dot ch
2006-08-10 14:08 ` whaley at cs dot utsa dot edu
2006-08-10 14:29 ` paolo dot bonzini at lu dot unisi dot ch
2006-08-10 15:16 ` whaley at cs dot utsa dot edu
2006-08-10 15:22 ` paolo dot bonzini at lu dot unisi dot ch
2006-08-11  9:19 ` uros at kss-loka dot si
2006-08-11 13:26 ` bonzini at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-08-11 14:10 ` [Bug target/27827] [4.0 " bonzini at gnu dot org
2006-08-11 15:22 ` whaley at cs dot utsa dot edu
2006-08-23 10:36 ` oliver dot jennrich at googlemail dot com
2006-10-07 10:06 ` steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-02-13  2:59 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20060629023229.16292.qmail@sourceware.org \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).