From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 30440 invoked by alias); 3 Jul 2006 05:19:29 -0000 Received: (qmail 30370 invoked by uid 48); 3 Jul 2006 05:19:20 -0000 Date: Mon, 03 Jul 2006 05:19:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20060703051920.30369.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug c++/21498] clause 7.1.5.3/2 of the c++ is not enforced In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2006-07/txt/msg00089.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Comment #8 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-07-03 05:19 ------- I'm sorry; I had missed the fact that the elaborated type specifier refers uses a typedef-name. This code is in fact invalid, since an elaborated type specifier may not refer to a typedef-name. -- mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED Resolution|INVALID | http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21498