public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug testsuite/28242] New: running the testsuite with -fstack-protector does fail
@ 2006-07-04 7:17 debian-gcc at lists dot debian dot org
2006-07-04 14:41 ` [Bug testsuite/28242] running the testsuite with -fstack-protector fail (not finding libssp) pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (2 more replies)
0 siblings, 3 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: debian-gcc at lists dot debian dot org @ 2006-07-04 7:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
running the testsuite with -fstack-protector fails if no libssp.* is installed
in a system path, or the ssp libraries from the system path are used, if they
are found.
Matthias
--
Summary: running the testsuite with -fstack-protector does fail
Product: gcc
Version: 4.1.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: testsuite
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: debian-gcc at lists dot debian dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28242
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [Bug testsuite/28242] running the testsuite with -fstack-protector fail (not finding libssp)
2006-07-04 7:17 [Bug testsuite/28242] New: running the testsuite with -fstack-protector does fail debian-gcc at lists dot debian dot org
@ 2006-07-04 14:41 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-05-20 18:27 ` ro at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-05-21 1:53 ` hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-07-04 14:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-07-04 14:40 -------
Confirmed, what should happen is we should add the build library directory to
the library path if -fstack-protector is supplied. I think adding -lmudflap
-fmudflap has the same issue.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Severity|normal |enhancement
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00 |2006-07-04 14:40:54
date| |
Summary|running the testsuite with -|running the testsuite with -
|fstack-protector does fail |fstack-protector fail (not
| |finding libssp)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28242
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [Bug testsuite/28242] running the testsuite with -fstack-protector fail (not finding libssp)
2006-07-04 7:17 [Bug testsuite/28242] New: running the testsuite with -fstack-protector does fail debian-gcc at lists dot debian dot org
2006-07-04 14:41 ` [Bug testsuite/28242] running the testsuite with -fstack-protector fail (not finding libssp) pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2010-05-20 18:27 ` ro at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-05-21 1:53 ` hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: ro at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2010-05-20 18:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #2 from ro at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-20 18:26 -------
This is not an enhancement, but simply a bug: the testsuite should use the
built
libraries, not some version that happens (or not) to be installed on the
system.
--
ro at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |ro at gcc dot gnu dot org
Severity|enhancement |normal
Known to fail| |4.6.0
Last reconfirmed|2006-07-04 14:40:54 |2010-05-20 18:26:55
date| |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28242
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [Bug testsuite/28242] running the testsuite with -fstack-protector fail (not finding libssp)
2006-07-04 7:17 [Bug testsuite/28242] New: running the testsuite with -fstack-protector does fail debian-gcc at lists dot debian dot org
2006-07-04 14:41 ` [Bug testsuite/28242] running the testsuite with -fstack-protector fail (not finding libssp) pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-05-20 18:27 ` ro at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2010-05-21 1:53 ` hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: hjl dot tools at gmail dot com @ 2010-05-21 1:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #3 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2010-05-21 01:53 -------
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 32064 ***
--
hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution| |DUPLICATE
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28242
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2010-05-21 1:53 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2006-07-04 7:17 [Bug testsuite/28242] New: running the testsuite with -fstack-protector does fail debian-gcc at lists dot debian dot org
2006-07-04 14:41 ` [Bug testsuite/28242] running the testsuite with -fstack-protector fail (not finding libssp) pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-05-20 18:27 ` ro at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-05-21 1:53 ` hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).