public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "ro at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/28307] [4.1/4.2 Regression] pthread functions in libgcc not weak any more on Tru64 UNIX
Date: Fri, 07 Jul 2006 17:58:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060707175810.30034.qmail@sourceware.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-28307-81@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>



------- Comment #3 from ro at gcc dot gnu dot org  2006-07-07 17:58 -------
Created an attachment (id=11851)
 --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=11851&action=view)
Revised patch

Minor correction: with the original patch, some functions (those which didn't
use
#pragma extern_prefix) were still not marked weak.  In the presence of #pragma
extern_prefix, #pragma weak still needs to refer to the unprefixed name.

With the attached patch, at least the unmodified boehm-gc 6.7 tested
successfully.


-- 

ro at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu   |ro at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   |dot org                     |
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |ASSIGNED


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28307


  parent reply	other threads:[~2006-07-07 17:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-07-07 17:07 [Bug target/28307] New: " gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-07-07 17:09 ` [Bug target/28307] " ro at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-07-07 17:58 ` ro at gcc dot gnu dot org [this message]
2006-09-10 16:57 ` jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-09-20 22:26 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-09-21  2:35 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-10-05  8:50 ` markus dot schoepflin at comsoft dot de
2007-02-14  9:40 ` [Bug target/28307] [4.1/4.2/4.3 " mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-07-03 13:36 ` ro at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-07-03 13:41 ` ro at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-07-03 13:43 ` ro at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-07-03 13:45 ` ro at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-07-03 13:46 ` ro at gcc dot gnu dot org

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20060707175810.30034.qmail@sourceware.org \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).