* [Bug fortran/25270] gfortran.dg/array-1.f90 fails with a type mismatch
2005-12-05 18:52 [Bug fortran/25270] New: gfortran.dg/array-1.f90 fails with a type mismatch pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-12-05 18:53 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-12-05 18:53 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (6 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-12-05 18:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-05 18:53 -------
So does gfortran.dg/array_constructor_10.f90
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
GCC target triplet| |x86_64-linux-gnu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25270
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread* [Bug fortran/25270] gfortran.dg/array-1.f90 fails with a type mismatch
2005-12-05 18:52 [Bug fortran/25270] New: gfortran.dg/array-1.f90 fails with a type mismatch pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-12-05 18:53 ` [Bug fortran/25270] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-12-05 18:53 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-12-05 18:57 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (5 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-12-05 18:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-05 18:53 -------
gfortran.dg/array_alloc_2.f90 fails the same way.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25270
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread* [Bug fortran/25270] gfortran.dg/array-1.f90 fails with a type mismatch
2005-12-05 18:52 [Bug fortran/25270] New: gfortran.dg/array-1.f90 fails with a type mismatch pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-12-05 18:53 ` [Bug fortran/25270] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-12-05 18:53 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-12-05 18:57 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-12-10 5:20 ` [Bug fortran/25270] gfortran.dg/array-1.f90 (and a lot of others) " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (4 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-12-05 18:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-05 18:57 -------
And gfortran.dg/array_constructor_11.f90
gfortran.dg/array_constructor_12.f90
gfortran.dg/array_constructor_6.f90
gfortran.dg/array_constructor_7.f90
gfortran.dg/array_constructor_8.f90
gfortran.dg/array_constructor_9.f90
gfortran.dg/assign_2.f90
gfortran.dg/assign_5.f90
gfortran.dg/assign_6.f90
gfortran.dg/assign_func_dtcomp_1.f90
gfortran.dg/assumed_dummy_1.f90
gfortran.dg/char_initialiser_actual.f90
gfortran.dg/char_pack_1.f90
And too many more.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25270
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread* [Bug fortran/25270] gfortran.dg/array-1.f90 (and a lot of others) fails with a type mismatch
2005-12-05 18:52 [Bug fortran/25270] New: gfortran.dg/array-1.f90 fails with a type mismatch pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2005-12-05 18:57 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-12-10 5:20 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-04-01 19:19 ` sayle at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (3 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-12-10 5:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #4 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-10 05:20 -------
assign_5.f90, assign_6.f, logint-1.f, logint-3.f, 7388.f, and a couple of
others were fixed by:
2005-12-09 Roger Sayle <roger@eyesopen.com>
PR fortran/22527
* f95-lang.c (gfc_truthvalue_conversion): Use a zero of the correct
integer type when building an inequality.
This bug report is not fully fixed yet though.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Summary|gfortran.dg/array-1.f90 |gfortran.dg/array-1.f90 (and
|fails with a type mismatch |a lot of others) fails with
| |a type mismatch
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25270
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread* [Bug fortran/25270] gfortran.dg/array-1.f90 (and a lot of others) fails with a type mismatch
2005-12-05 18:52 [Bug fortran/25270] New: gfortran.dg/array-1.f90 fails with a type mismatch pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2005-12-10 5:20 ` [Bug fortran/25270] gfortran.dg/array-1.f90 (and a lot of others) " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2006-04-01 19:19 ` sayle at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-05-08 9:33 ` [Bug fortran/25270] testcases fail " fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (2 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: sayle at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-04-01 19:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #5 from sayle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-01 19:19 -------
Subject: Bug 25270
Author: sayle
Date: Sat Apr 1 19:19:22 2006
New Revision: 112608
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=112608
Log:
PR fortran/25270
* trans-array.c (gfc_trans_allocate_array_storage): In array index
calculations use gfc_index_zero_node and gfc_index_one_node instead
of integer_zero_node and integer_one_node respectively.
(gfc_conv_array_transpose): Likewise.
(gfc_conv_ss_startstride): Likewise.
(gfc_trans_dummy_array_bias): Likewise.
Modified:
trunk/gcc/fortran/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/fortran/trans-array.c
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25270
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread* [Bug fortran/25270] testcases fail with a type mismatch
2005-12-05 18:52 [Bug fortran/25270] New: gfortran.dg/array-1.f90 fails with a type mismatch pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2006-04-01 19:19 ` sayle at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2006-05-08 9:33 ` fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-07-05 15:09 ` fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-07-11 8:00 ` fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org
7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-05-08 9:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #6 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-08 09:32 -------
Andrew, what is the status on that bug? Do you still observe mismatch in the
testsuite, or can we close the PR?
--
fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot
| |org
Summary|gfortran.dg/array-1.f90 (and|testcases fail with a type
|a lot of others) fails with |mismatch
|a type mismatch |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25270
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread* [Bug fortran/25270] testcases fail with a type mismatch
2005-12-05 18:52 [Bug fortran/25270] New: gfortran.dg/array-1.f90 fails with a type mismatch pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2006-05-08 9:33 ` [Bug fortran/25270] testcases fail " fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2006-07-05 15:09 ` fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-07-11 8:00 ` fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org
7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-07-05 15:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #7 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-07-05 15:09 -------
(In reply to comment #6)
> Andrew, what is the status on that bug? Do you still observe mismatch in the
> testsuite, or can we close the PR?
ping
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25270
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread* [Bug fortran/25270] testcases fail with a type mismatch
2005-12-05 18:52 [Bug fortran/25270] New: gfortran.dg/array-1.f90 fails with a type mismatch pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2006-07-05 15:09 ` fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2006-07-11 8:00 ` fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org
7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-07-11 8:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #8 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-07-11 07:59 -------
Closing.
--
fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25270
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread