From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 30363 invoked by alias); 15 Jul 2006 15:46:15 -0000 Received: (qmail 30218 invoked by alias); 15 Jul 2006 15:45:55 -0000 Date: Sat, 15 Jul 2006 15:46:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20060715154555.30217.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug target/28102] [4.2 Regression] GNU Hurd bootstrap error: 'OPTION_GLIBC' undeclared In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "ams at gnu dot org" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2006-07/txt/msg01122.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Comment #6 from ams at gnu dot org 2006-07-15 15:45 ------- Subject: Re: [4.2 Regression] GNU Hurd bootstrap error: 'OPTION_GLIBC' undeclared Only the following code will be duplicated which is hardly any after all: That is from [gcc]/gcc/config/linux.h, I'm talking about [gcc]/gcc/config/i386/{linux,gnu}.h. Which is also the one causing problems without the patch I sent. I don't want/have time/etc to worry about this right now, it isn't a very high priority thing anyway. I also don't think it is a very good idea to copy the content form */linux.h into */gnu.h... FYI, GNU/k*BSD also uses the GNU/Linux headers, and it doesn't support uclibc AFAIK. Cheers. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28102