[Bug fortran/20844] ADVANCE=specifier in output statement

[Bug fortran/20844] ADVANCE=specifier in output statement

[pault at gcc dot gnu dot org]

-- 

pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu   |pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   |dot org                     |
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
            Summary|error needed                |ADVANCE=specifier in output
                   |                            |statement


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20844

[Bug fortran/20844] ADVANCE=specifier in output statement

[pault at gcc dot gnu dot org]

------- Comment #3 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org  2006-07-16 15:02 -------
Subject: Bug 20844

Author: pault
Date: Sun Jul 16 15:01:59 2006
New Revision: 115499

URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=115499
Log:
2006-07-16  Paul Thomas  <pault@gcc.gnu.org>

        PR fortran/28384
        * trans-common.c (translate_common): If common_segment is NULL
        emit error that common block does not exist.

        PR fortran/20844
        * io.c (check_io_constraints): It is an error if an ADVANCE
        specifier appears without an explicit format.

        PR fortran/28201
        * resolve.c (resolve_generic_s): For a use_associated function,
        do not search for an alternative symbol in the parent name
        space.

        PR fortran/20893
        * resolve.c (resolve_elemental_actual): New function t combine
        all the checks of elemental procedure actual arguments. In
        addition, check of array valued optional args(this PR) has
        been added.
        (resolve_function, resolve_call): Remove parts that treated
        elemental procedure actual arguments and call the above.

2006-07-16  Paul Thomas  <pault@gcc.gnu.org>

        PR fortran/20844
        * gfortran.dg/io_constaints_2.f90: Add the test for ADVANCE
        specifiers requiring an explicit format tag..

        PR fortran/28201
        * gfortran.dg/generic_5: New test.

        PR fortran/20893
        * gfortran.dg/elemental_optional_args_1.f90: New test.


Added:
    trunk/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/elemental_optional_args_1.f90
    trunk/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/generic_5.f90
Modified:
    trunk/gcc/fortran/ChangeLog
    trunk/gcc/fortran/io.c
    trunk/gcc/fortran/resolve.c
    trunk/gcc/fortran/trans-common.c
    trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
    trunk/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/io_constraints_2.f90


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20844

[Bug fortran/20844] ADVANCE=specifier in output statement

[pault at gcc dot gnu dot org]

------- Comment #4 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org  2006-07-16 17:17 -------
Subject: Bug 20844

Author: pault
Date: Sun Jul 16 17:17:04 2006
New Revision: 115502

URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=115502
Log:
2006-07-16  Paul Thomas  <pault@gcc.gnu.org>

        PR fortran/28384
        * trans-common.c (translate_common): If common_segment is NULL
        emit error that common block does not exist.

        PR fortran/20844
        * io.c (check_io_constraints): It is an error if an ADVANCE
        specifier appears without an explicit format.

        PR fortran/28201
        * resolve.c (resolve_generic_s): For a use_associated function,
        do not search for an alternative symbol in the parent name
        space.

        PR fortran/20893
        * resolve.c (resolve_elemental_actual): New function t combine
        all the checks of elemental procedure actual arguments. In
        addition, check of array valued optional args(this PR) has
        been added.
        (resolve_function, resolve_call): Remove parts that treated
        elemental procedure actual arguments and call the above.

        PR fortran/28353
        * trans-expr.c (gfc_conv_aliased_arg): Missing formal arg means
        that intent is INOUT (fixes regression).

        PR fortran/25097
        * check.c (check_present): The only permitted reference is a
        full array reference.

        PR fortran/20903
        * decl.c (variable_decl): Add error if a derived type is not
        from the current namespace if the namespace is an interface
        body.

2006-07-16  Paul Thomas  <pault@gcc.gnu.org>

        PR fortran/20844
        * gfortran.dg/io_constaints_2.f90: Add the test for ADVANCE
        specifiers requiring an explicit format tag..

        PR fortran/28201
        * gfortran.dg/generic_5: New test.

        PR fortran/20893
        * gfortran.dg/elemental_optional_args_1.f90: New test.

        PR fortran/25097
        * gfortran.dg/present_1.f90: New test.

        PR fortran/20903
        * gfortran.dg/interface_derived_type_1.f90: New test.

Added:
   
branches/gcc-4_1-branch/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/elemental_optional_args_1.f90
    branches/gcc-4_1-branch/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/generic_5.f90
   
branches/gcc-4_1-branch/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/interface_derived_type_1.f90
    branches/gcc-4_1-branch/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/present_1.f90
Modified:
    branches/gcc-4_1-branch/gcc/fortran/ChangeLog
    branches/gcc-4_1-branch/gcc/fortran/check.c
    branches/gcc-4_1-branch/gcc/fortran/decl.c
    branches/gcc-4_1-branch/gcc/fortran/io.c
    branches/gcc-4_1-branch/gcc/fortran/resolve.c
    branches/gcc-4_1-branch/gcc/fortran/trans-common.c
    branches/gcc-4_1-branch/gcc/fortran/trans-expr.c
    branches/gcc-4_1-branch/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
    branches/gcc-4_1-branch/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/io_constraints_2.f90


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20844

[Bug fortran/20844] ADVANCE=specifier in output statement

[pault at gcc dot gnu dot org]

------- Comment #5 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org  2006-07-16 17:18 -------
Fixed on trunk and 4.2

Paul


-- 

pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20844