public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug fortran/28335] New: flush() / write() statement on closed units - error?
@ 2006-07-11 9:04 tobias dot burnus at physik dot fu-berlin dot de
2006-07-18 10:47 ` [Bug fortran/28335] " fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (16 more replies)
0 siblings, 17 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: tobias dot burnus at physik dot fu-berlin dot de @ 2006-07-11 9:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
The Fortran 2003 standard declares:
"Every input/output statement except an OPEN, CLOSE, INQUIRE, or WAIT statement
shall refer to a unit that is connected to a file"
gfortran does not give a run-time error. However, I don't know whether one
should enforce the standard (and thus do this check).
program test
write(*,*) 'Hello'
flush(6) ! preconnected unit (stdout)
flush(99)! preconnected unit
! flush() ! invalid
close(88) ! close preconnected unit <<<<<<<<
close(88) ! close once more
! wait(88) ! not supported by gfortran
flush(88) ! invalid <<<<<<<<<<<<<
write(88,*) 'This should also produce an error' !<<<<<<
end program test
Expected: Like NAG f95 (or g95)
Hello
Unit 88 is not connected
Program terminated by fatal I/O error
In TEST, line 9 of flush.f90
--
Summary: flush() / write() statement on closed units - error?
Product: gcc
Version: 4.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: minor
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: tobias dot burnus at physik dot fu-berlin dot de
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28335
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/28335] flush() / write() statement on closed units - error?
2006-07-11 9:04 [Bug fortran/28335] New: flush() / write() statement on closed units - error? tobias dot burnus at physik dot fu-berlin dot de
@ 2006-07-18 10:47 ` fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-07-25 5:10 ` patchapp at dberlin dot org
` (15 subsequent siblings)
16 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-07-18 10:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #1 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-07-18 10:47 -------
Reduced testcase:
close(88)
flush(88)
end
You expect the above code to issue a runtime error, but we currently don't.
--
fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot
| |org
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00 |2006-07-18 10:47:39
date| |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28335
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/28335] flush() / write() statement on closed units - error?
2006-07-11 9:04 [Bug fortran/28335] New: flush() / write() statement on closed units - error? tobias dot burnus at physik dot fu-berlin dot de
2006-07-18 10:47 ` [Bug fortran/28335] " fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2006-07-25 5:10 ` patchapp at dberlin dot org
2006-07-26 1:47 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (14 subsequent siblings)
16 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: patchapp at dberlin dot org @ 2006-07-25 5:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #2 from patchapp at dberlin dot org 2006-07-25 05:10 -------
Subject: Bug number PR28335
A patch for this bug has been added to the patch tracker.
The mailing list url for the patch is
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-07/msg01054.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28335
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/28335] flush() / write() statement on closed units - error?
2006-07-11 9:04 [Bug fortran/28335] New: flush() / write() statement on closed units - error? tobias dot burnus at physik dot fu-berlin dot de
2006-07-18 10:47 ` [Bug fortran/28335] " fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-07-25 5:10 ` patchapp at dberlin dot org
@ 2006-07-26 1:47 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-07-26 1:51 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (13 subsequent siblings)
16 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-07-26 1:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #3 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-07-26 01:47 -------
Subject: Bug 28335
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Wed Jul 26 01:47:13 2006
New Revision: 115750
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=115750
Log:
2006-07-25 Jerry DeLisle <jvdelisle@gcc.gnu.org>
PR libgfortran/28335
* gfortran.dg/no_unit_error_1.f90: New test.
* gfortran.dg/no_unit_error_2.f90: New test.
* gfortran.dg/temporary_1.f90: Remove extraneous CLOSE.
Added:
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/no_unit_error_1.f90
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/no_unit_error_2.f90
Modified:
trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/temporary_1.f90
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28335
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/28335] flush() / write() statement on closed units - error?
2006-07-11 9:04 [Bug fortran/28335] New: flush() / write() statement on closed units - error? tobias dot burnus at physik dot fu-berlin dot de
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2006-07-26 1:47 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2006-07-26 1:51 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-07-26 6:23 ` [Bug fortran/28335] [4.1 only] " fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (12 subsequent siblings)
16 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-07-26 1:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #4 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-07-26 01:51 -------
Patch was committed also, but I messed up pr number in ChangeLog. Fixed that.
This PR is fixed in 4.2 only.
--
jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
Target Milestone|--- |4.2.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28335
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/28335] [4.1 only] flush() / write() statement on closed units - error?
2006-07-11 9:04 [Bug fortran/28335] New: flush() / write() statement on closed units - error? tobias dot burnus at physik dot fu-berlin dot de
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2006-07-26 1:51 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2006-07-26 6:23 ` fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-07-27 1:01 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (11 subsequent siblings)
16 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-07-26 6:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #5 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-07-26 06:22 -------
Hum... don't we want to backport that fix to 4.1?
--
fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |jvdelisle at verizon dot net
Known to fail| |4.1.2
Known to work| |4.2.0
Summary|flush() / write() statement |[4.1 only] flush() / write()
|on closed units - error? |statement on closed units -
| |error?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28335
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/28335] [4.1 only] flush() / write() statement on closed units - error?
2006-07-11 9:04 [Bug fortran/28335] New: flush() / write() statement on closed units - error? tobias dot burnus at physik dot fu-berlin dot de
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2006-07-26 6:23 ` [Bug fortran/28335] [4.1 only] " fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2006-07-27 1:01 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-07-27 5:13 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (10 subsequent siblings)
16 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-07-27 1:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #6 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-07-27 01:01 -------
OK , simple enough. Will do shortly.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28335
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/28335] [4.1 only] flush() / write() statement on closed units - error?
2006-07-11 9:04 [Bug fortran/28335] New: flush() / write() statement on closed units - error? tobias dot burnus at physik dot fu-berlin dot de
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2006-07-27 1:01 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2006-07-27 5:13 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-07-27 5:14 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (9 subsequent siblings)
16 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-07-27 5:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #7 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-07-27 05:13 -------
Subject: Bug 28335
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Thu Jul 27 05:12:59 2006
New Revision: 115771
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=115771
Log:
2006-07-26 Jerry DeLisle <jvdelisle@gcc.gnu.org>
PR libgfortran/28335
* gfortran.dg/temporary_1.f90: Remove unused CLOSE.
Modified:
branches/gcc-4_1-branch/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
branches/gcc-4_1-branch/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/temporary_1.f90
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28335
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/28335] [4.1 only] flush() / write() statement on closed units - error?
2006-07-11 9:04 [Bug fortran/28335] New: flush() / write() statement on closed units - error? tobias dot burnus at physik dot fu-berlin dot de
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2006-07-27 5:13 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2006-07-27 5:14 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-07-30 23:12 ` steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (8 subsequent siblings)
16 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-07-27 5:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #8 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-07-27 05:14 -------
Subject: Bug 28335
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Thu Jul 27 05:14:19 2006
New Revision: 115772
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=115772
Log:
2006-07-26 Jerry DeLisle <jvdelisle@gcc.gnu.org>
PR libgfortran/28335
* close.c (st_close): Add error when UNIT does not exist.
* file_position.c (st_flush): Add error when UNIT does not exist.
Modified:
branches/gcc-4_1-branch/libgfortran/ChangeLog
branches/gcc-4_1-branch/libgfortran/io/close.c
branches/gcc-4_1-branch/libgfortran/io/file_pos.c
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28335
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/28335] [4.1 only] flush() / write() statement on closed units - error?
2006-07-11 9:04 [Bug fortran/28335] New: flush() / write() statement on closed units - error? tobias dot burnus at physik dot fu-berlin dot de
` (7 preceding siblings ...)
2006-07-27 5:14 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2006-07-30 23:12 ` steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-07-30 23:13 ` steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (7 subsequent siblings)
16 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: steven at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-07-30 23:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #9 from steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-07-30 23:12 -------
Shame on us for following the gut feeling instead of the Standard.
As Steve Kargl pointed out on the mailing list:
F95 standard, Section 9.3.5, page 143, lines 6 an 7.
Execution of a CLOSE statement specify a unit that does not
exit or has no file connected to it is permitted and affects
no file.
F2003 has the exact same text. Seems we have a regression.
--
steven at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED
Resolution|FIXED |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28335
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/28335] [4.1 only] flush() / write() statement on closed units - error?
2006-07-11 9:04 [Bug fortran/28335] New: flush() / write() statement on closed units - error? tobias dot burnus at physik dot fu-berlin dot de
` (8 preceding siblings ...)
2006-07-30 23:12 ` steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2006-07-30 23:13 ` steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-07-30 23:15 ` [Bug fortran/28335] [4.2 Regression] " steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (6 subsequent siblings)
16 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: steven at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-07-30 23:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
--
steven at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot
|dot org |org
Status|REOPENED |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28335
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/28335] [4.2 Regression] flush() / write() statement on closed units - error?
2006-07-11 9:04 [Bug fortran/28335] New: flush() / write() statement on closed units - error? tobias dot burnus at physik dot fu-berlin dot de
` (9 preceding siblings ...)
2006-07-30 23:13 ` steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2006-07-30 23:15 ` steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-07-31 0:09 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (5 subsequent siblings)
16 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: steven at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-07-30 23:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
--
steven at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Priority|P3 |P4
Summary|[4.1 only] flush() / write()|[4.2 Regression] flush() /
|statement on closed units - |write() statement on closed
|error? |units - error?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28335
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/28335] [4.2 Regression] flush() / write() statement on closed units - error?
2006-07-11 9:04 [Bug fortran/28335] New: flush() / write() statement on closed units - error? tobias dot burnus at physik dot fu-berlin dot de
` (10 preceding siblings ...)
2006-07-30 23:15 ` [Bug fortran/28335] [4.2 Regression] " steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2006-07-31 0:09 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-07-31 0:15 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (4 subsequent siblings)
16 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-07-31 0:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #10 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-07-31 00:09 -------
Subject: Bug 28335
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Mon Jul 31 00:09:16 2006
New Revision: 115828
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=115828
Log:
2006-07-30 Jerry DeLisle <jvdelisle@gcc.gnu.org>
PR libgfortran/28335
* gfortran.dg/no_unit_error_1.f90: Delete test.
* gfortran.dg/no_unit_error_2.f90: Delete test.
Removed:
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/no_unit_error_1.f90
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/no_unit_error_2.f90
Modified:
trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28335
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/28335] [4.2 Regression] flush() / write() statement on closed units - error?
2006-07-11 9:04 [Bug fortran/28335] New: flush() / write() statement on closed units - error? tobias dot burnus at physik dot fu-berlin dot de
` (11 preceding siblings ...)
2006-07-31 0:09 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2006-07-31 0:15 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-07-31 1:32 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (3 subsequent siblings)
16 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-07-31 0:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #11 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-07-31 00:15 -------
Subject: Bug 28335
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Mon Jul 31 00:15:08 2006
New Revision: 115829
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=115829
Log:
2006-07-30 Jerry DeLisle <jvdelisle@gcc.gnu.org>
PR libgfortran/28335
* close.c (st_close): Revert previous patch and add comment.
* file_position.c (st_flush): Revert previous patch and add comment.
Modified:
trunk/libgfortran/ChangeLog
trunk/libgfortran/io/close.c
trunk/libgfortran/io/file_pos.c
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28335
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/28335] [4.2 Regression] flush() / write() statement on closed units - error?
2006-07-11 9:04 [Bug fortran/28335] New: flush() / write() statement on closed units - error? tobias dot burnus at physik dot fu-berlin dot de
` (12 preceding siblings ...)
2006-07-31 0:15 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2006-07-31 1:32 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-07-31 1:36 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (2 subsequent siblings)
16 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-07-31 1:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #12 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-07-31 01:32 -------
Subject: Bug 28335
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Mon Jul 31 01:32:38 2006
New Revision: 115835
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=115835
Log:
2006-07-30 Jerry DeLisle <jvdelisle@gcc.gnu.org>
PR libgfortran/28335
* file_position.c (st_flush): Add clearer error when UNIT does not
exist. Add reference to standard in comment.
Modified:
trunk/libgfortran/ChangeLog
trunk/libgfortran/io/file_pos.c
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28335
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/28335] [4.2 Regression] flush() / write() statement on closed units - error?
2006-07-11 9:04 [Bug fortran/28335] New: flush() / write() statement on closed units - error? tobias dot burnus at physik dot fu-berlin dot de
` (13 preceding siblings ...)
2006-07-31 1:32 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2006-07-31 1:36 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-07-31 1:57 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-07-31 2:02 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
16 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-07-31 1:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #13 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-07-31 01:36 -------
Subject: Bug 28335
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Mon Jul 31 01:36:44 2006
New Revision: 115836
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=115836
Log:
2006-07-30 Jerry DeLisle <jvdelisle@gcc.gnu.org>
PR libgfortran/28335
* gfortran.dg/no_unit_error_1.f90: New test.
Added:
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/no_unit_error_1.f90
Modified:
trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28335
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/28335] [4.2 Regression] flush() / write() statement on closed units - error?
2006-07-11 9:04 [Bug fortran/28335] New: flush() / write() statement on closed units - error? tobias dot burnus at physik dot fu-berlin dot de
` (14 preceding siblings ...)
2006-07-31 1:36 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2006-07-31 1:57 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-07-31 2:02 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
16 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-07-31 1:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #14 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-07-31 01:57 -------
Subject: Bug 28335
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Mon Jul 31 01:57:25 2006
New Revision: 115837
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=115837
Log:
2006-07-30 Jerry DeLisle <jvdelisle@gcc.gnu.org>
PR libgfortran/28335
* close.c (st_close): Revert error when UNIT does not exist.
Add comment to reference standard.
* file_position.c (st_flush): Improve error message.
Add comment to reference standard.
Modified:
branches/gcc-4_1-branch/libgfortran/ChangeLog
branches/gcc-4_1-branch/libgfortran/io/close.c
branches/gcc-4_1-branch/libgfortran/io/file_pos.c
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28335
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/28335] [4.2 Regression] flush() / write() statement on closed units - error?
2006-07-11 9:04 [Bug fortran/28335] New: flush() / write() statement on closed units - error? tobias dot burnus at physik dot fu-berlin dot de
` (15 preceding siblings ...)
2006-07-31 1:57 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2006-07-31 2:02 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
16 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-07-31 2:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #15 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-07-31 02:02 -------
Fixed on 4.1 and 4.2. Please accept my apologies.
--
jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28335
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2006-07-31 2:02 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2006-07-11 9:04 [Bug fortran/28335] New: flush() / write() statement on closed units - error? tobias dot burnus at physik dot fu-berlin dot de
2006-07-18 10:47 ` [Bug fortran/28335] " fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-07-25 5:10 ` patchapp at dberlin dot org
2006-07-26 1:47 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-07-26 1:51 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-07-26 6:23 ` [Bug fortran/28335] [4.1 only] " fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-07-27 1:01 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-07-27 5:13 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-07-27 5:14 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-07-30 23:12 ` steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-07-30 23:13 ` steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-07-30 23:15 ` [Bug fortran/28335] [4.2 Regression] " steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-07-31 0:09 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-07-31 0:15 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-07-31 1:32 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-07-31 1:36 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-07-31 1:57 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-07-31 2:02 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).