From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 12999 invoked by alias); 27 Jul 2006 17:29:48 -0000 Received: (qmail 12711 invoked by uid 48); 27 Jul 2006 17:29:38 -0000 Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2006 17:29:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20060727172938.12710.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug debug/27574] [4.1/4.2 Regression] MIssing debug info at -O0 for a local variable in a C++ constructor In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2006-07/txt/msg02116.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Comment #13 from amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-07-27 17:29 ------- (In reply to comment #12) > It is a cgraph change. There were several patches affecting cgraph_remove_node > during this time period; it was probably one of those. The problem appeared from r96653 to r96654; AFAICT this is the gcc-patches posting for the associated patch: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-03/msg01709.html -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27574