From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 7300 invoked by alias); 28 Jul 2006 09:41:47 -0000 Received: (qmail 7235 invoked by alias); 28 Jul 2006 09:41:39 -0000 Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2006 09:41:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20060728094139.7234.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug rtl-optimization/28071] [4.1/4.2 regression] A file that can not be compiled in reasonable time/space In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "hubicka at ucw dot cz" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2006-07/txt/msg02155.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Comment #32 from hubicka at ucw dot cz 2006-07-28 09:41 ------- Subject: Re: [4.1/4.2 regression] A file that can not be compiled in reasonable time/space Hi, I've added this testcase to our's memory regression tester (see gcc-regression mainling list), so hopefully the quadratic memory consumption issues will be tracked now. It would be nice to have runtime benchmark variant of the test we can track the runtime and compilation time. It seems to uncover quite interesting behaviours across the compiler. Honza -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28071