From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-192686-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 12768 invoked by alias); 31 Jul 2006 08:20:23 -0000
Received: (qmail 12744 invoked by uid 48); 31 Jul 2006 08:20:13 -0000
Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2006 08:20:00 -0000
Message-ID: <20060731082013.12743.qmail@sourceware.org>
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
References: <bug-28514-365@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Subject: [Bug c++/28514] [4.2 Regression] libstdc++ vs. anonymous namespaces
In-Reply-To: <bug-28514-365@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
From: "jason at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2006-07/txt/msg02333.txt.bz2
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>



------- Comment #8 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org  2006-07-31 08:20 -------
In general, I think using the anonymous namespace in headers is not what you
want.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28514