From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 25630 invoked by alias); 2 Aug 2006 17:24:33 -0000 Received: (qmail 25481 invoked by uid 48); 2 Aug 2006 17:24:26 -0000 Date: Wed, 02 Aug 2006 17:24:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20060802172426.25480.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug middle-end/26983] [4.0/4.1/4.2 Regression] Missing label with builtin_setjmp/longjmp In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2006-08/txt/msg00072.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Comment #8 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-02 17:24 ------- (In reply to comment #7) > Is it possible that #28493 is a symptom of the same problem? Does anyone build > the darwin compiler with SjLj exceptions? Why would they, dwarf-2 eh's overhead is much smaller if throws are not done than sjlj exceptions. Also I think this is a different problem and the problem in the other PR is much older (dates back to 3.3/3.4 at least). -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26983