From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 10309 invoked by alias); 7 Aug 2006 16:02:49 -0000 Received: (qmail 10261 invoked by uid 48); 7 Aug 2006 16:02:40 -0000 Date: Mon, 07 Aug 2006 16:02:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20060807160240.10260.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug target/28635] Interaction between different asm statements In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "Martin dot vGagern at gmx dot net" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2006-08/txt/msg00499.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Comment #3 from Martin dot vGagern at gmx dot net 2006-08-07 16:02 ------- One more observation: I tried adding the flags corresponding to -O1 according to the info page: -fdefer-pop -fdelayed-branch -fguess-branch-probability -fcprop-registers -floop-optimize -fif-conversion -fif-conversion2 -ftree-ccp -ftree-dce -ftree-dominator-opts -ftree-dse -ftree-ter -ftree-lrs -ftree-sra -ftree-copyrename -ftree-fre -ftree-ch -fmerge-constants The effect for my example is the same as -O0, not -O1, so the cause for the different behaviour must be some optimization included in -O1 and not corresponding to one of the mentioned flags. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28635