From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 12624 invoked by alias); 7 Aug 2006 23:12:48 -0000 Received: (qmail 12589 invoked by uid 48); 7 Aug 2006 23:12:41 -0000 Date: Mon, 07 Aug 2006 23:12:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20060807231241.12588.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug target/28183] [4.0/4.1/4.2 regression] assembler error "FATAL: can't close x.o" on m68k with new binutils In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "schwab at suse dot de" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2006-08/txt/msg00551.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Comment #4 from schwab at suse dot de 2006-08-07 23:12 ------- The removed comment says: - /* If will do cse, generate all results into pseudo registers - since 1) that allows cse to find more things - and 2) otherwise cse could produce an insn the machine - cannot support. An exception is a CONSTRUCTOR into a multi-word - MEM: that's much more likely to be most efficient into the MEM. - Another is a CALL_EXPR which must return in memory. */ So it looks like point 2 is true. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28183