From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 21882 invoked by alias); 10 Aug 2006 16:54:09 -0000 Received: (qmail 21831 invoked by uid 48); 10 Aug 2006 16:54:03 -0000 Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2006 16:54:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20060810165403.21830.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug c++/4131] Why the C++ compiler don't place a const class object to ".rodata" section? In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "mrs at apple dot com" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2006-08/txt/msg00795.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Comment #12 from mrs at apple dot com 2006-08-10 16:54 ------- Trivially, one could use turing completeness at compile time to achieve the desired result. :-) Not that I think that is better than `fixing' this bug. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4131