From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 14494 invoked by alias); 18 Aug 2006 03:30:20 -0000 Received: (qmail 13861 invoked by uid 48); 18 Aug 2006 03:30:09 -0000 Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2006 03:30:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20060818033009.13855.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug c++/28766] compound literal expression vs templates In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2006-08/txt/msg01398.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-18 03:30 ------- This is not a regression as far as I can tell. Note I found this while working on PR 28418. -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Known to fail| |2.95.3 3.0.4 3.2.2 3.2.3 | |3.3.1 4.0.0 3.4.0 4.2.0 Summary| compound literal expression|compound literal expression |vs templates |vs templates http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28766