public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "pault at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug fortran/28788] [gfortran: 4.1, 4.2 regression] ICE on valid code
Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2006 20:02:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060822200205.13338.qmail@sourceware.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-28788-2736@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>



------- Comment #2 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org  2006-08-22 20:02 -------
I have figured out what the problem is:

The module procedure formal arguments go into their own namespace; derived type
references pointing to the contained namespace.  In the reformed association of
derived types, the symbols to which the formal arguments are pointing are
removed when host association occurs.  It is something of a miracle that the
old system works - it certainly was not intentional!

Now for a clean solution!

Paul


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28788


  parent reply	other threads:[~2006-08-22 20:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-08-21 11:37 [Bug fortran/28788] New: " martin at mpa-garching dot mpg dot de
2006-08-22  5:30 ` [Bug fortran/28788] " pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-08-22 20:02 ` pault at gcc dot gnu dot org [this message]
2006-08-23 13:20 ` paul dot richard dot thomas at cea dot fr
2006-08-23 14:51 ` patchapp at dberlin dot org
2006-08-24  4:47 ` pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-08-24  4:54 ` pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-08-25 12:57 ` martin at mpa-garching dot mpg dot de
2006-08-25 13:25 ` paulthomas2 at wanadoo dot fr
2006-08-25 14:36 ` martin at mpa-garching dot mpg dot de
2006-08-25 14:37 ` martin at mpa-garching dot mpg dot de
2006-08-25 17:09 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-08-26  9:30 ` paulthomas2 at wanadoo dot fr
2006-08-26 12:15 ` aovb94 at dsl dot pipex dot com
2006-08-26 21:27 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-08-28 11:57 ` paul dot richard dot thomas at cea dot fr
2006-08-29  4:51 ` pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-08-29  4:57 ` pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-08-30  4:37 ` pault at gcc dot gnu dot org

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20060822200205.13338.qmail@sourceware.org \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).