From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 2068 invoked by alias); 22 Aug 2006 23:34:38 -0000 Received: (qmail 1914 invoked by uid 48); 22 Aug 2006 23:34:30 -0000 Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2006 23:34:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20060822233430.1913.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug libgcj/28698] [gcj] libgcj-bc only used when building shared libs, not executables In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2006-08/txt/msg01907.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Comment #4 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-22 23:34 ------- Bryce pointed out that we need to deal with the primitive class objects somehow. Otherwise code like 'new int[5]' will pull in libgcj.so. I'll send a patch to the java-patches list. Could you try it on your test cases? I tried in on my copy of ecj.jar and verified that it works. -- tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |tromey at gcc dot gnu dot |dot org |org Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Ever Confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00 |2006-08-22 23:34:30 date| | http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28698